Define: Bonitary Ownership

Bonitary Ownership
Bonitary Ownership
Quick Summary of Bonitary Ownership

Bonitary ownership, recognised under Roman law, refers to a form of ownership where the property is conveyed through either an informal or formal transfer by someone who is not the true owner. For instance, if John sells a car to Mary, but he is not the rightful owner, Mary would have bonitary ownership of the car. While she has the right to use, manage, and enjoy the car, her ownership is not absolute due to John’s lack of true ownership. It is important to note that bonitary ownership differs from full ownership, which grants the complete set of rights to use, enjoy, and dispose of property without any limitations. In bonitary ownership, the ownership rights are limited by the fact that the transfer was not made by the true owner.

What is the dictionary definition of Bonitary Ownership?
Dictionary Definition of Bonitary Ownership

Bonitary ownership, also known as bonitarian ownership or in bonis habere, is a form of ownership that is acknowledged by Roman law. It pertains to the ownership of property that has been transferred informally or formally by someone who is not the rightful owner. Ownership entails the authority to possess and utilise something, as well as the ability to transfer it to others. Ownership rights are enduring, comprehensive, and inheritable.

Full Definition Of Bonitary Ownership

“Bonitary ownership, a concept originating from Roman law, represents a unique form of ownership distinct from the classical forms of property possession. It is particularly relevant within the context of civil law systems, providing an intriguing alternative to absolute ownership. This legal overview aims to explore the intricacies of bonitary ownership, its historical roots, distinctions from other types of ownership, and implications in modern legal systems, particularly within jurisdictions that draw heavily on Roman law principles.”

Historical Background

Bonitary ownership finds its roots in ancient Roman law, where property rights were categorised in various forms to address the complexities of ownership and possession. The Romans recognised two primary forms of ownership: “dominium” or “quiritarian” ownership, which was the highest form of legal title, and “bonitary” ownership, which was a more practical form of ownership granted under certain conditions.

In ancient Rome, quiritarian ownership was reserved for Roman citizens and applied to property that had been acquired according to strict legal forms. This ownership conferred complete and absolute control over the property. However, as the Roman Empire expanded, the need for a more flexible system of ownership became apparent, especially to accommodate non-citizens and the complexities of commerce.

Bonitary ownership emerged as a solution. It was recognised by the praetor, a judicial officer, who could grant equitable remedies in cases where strict legal ownership was absent. This form of ownership applied primarily to property transferred by methods that did not comply with the formalities required for quiritarian ownership but where the transfer was otherwise valid and effective.

Characteristics of Bonitary Ownership

Bonitary ownership is characterised by several key features that distinguish it from other forms of property ownership:

  1. Equitable Nature: Unlike quiritarian ownership, which is strictly legal, bonitary ownership is equitable. It arises from the need to recognise and protect the interests of individuals who have acquired property in good faith but without meeting the formal requirements of quiritarian ownership.
  2. Praetorian Grant: The praetor, acting as an equitable judicial authority, could grant bonitary ownership. This judicial intervention was crucial in bridging the gap between strict legal ownership and practical realities.
  3. Protection through Interdicts: Bonitary owners were protected by various interdicts (judicial orders) that prevented others from interfering with their possession. These interdicts ensured that bonitary owners could enjoy their property rights effectively.
  4. Conversion to Full Ownership: Over time, bonitary ownership could evolve into quiritarian ownership if certain conditions were met. For example, if a bonitary owner possessed the property for a sufficient period (usually two years for movable property and ten years for immovable property), they could claim full legal ownership.
  5. Good Faith Acquisition: A critical element of bonitary ownership is the good faith acquisition of property. The transferee must believe that they are acquiring valid ownership, even if the formalities are not fully satisfied.

Distinctions from Other Forms of Ownership

To fully understand bonitary ownership, it is essential to compare it with other forms of property ownership, particularly quiritarian ownership and possession.

  1. Quiritarian Ownership vs. Bonitary Ownership:
    • Formality: Quiritarian ownership requires strict adherence to formal legal procedures, such as mancipatio (a formal transfer process) or in iure cessio (a formal surrender before a magistrate). In contrast, bonitary ownership does not require such formalities.
    • Legal Recognition: Quiritarian ownership confers absolute legal title, whereas bonitary ownership is primarily equitable and recognised by the praetor.
    • Rights: Quiritarian owners have the full spectrum of property rights, including the right to vindicate (reclaim) the property from any possessor. Bonitary owners have protected possession but may not have the immediate right to vindicate against quiritarian owners.
  2. Possession vs. Bonitary Ownership:
    • Possession: Possession refers to the physical control of property without necessarily having any legal title. It can be protected through possessory interdicts but does not equate to ownership.
    • Bonitary Ownership: Bonitary ownership, while starting as a form of protected possession, implies a recognition of ownership rights that go beyond mere possession. It bridges the gap between possession and full legal ownership.

Legal Implications in Modern Jurisdictions

Although bonitary ownership is a concept rooted in Roman law, its principles continue to influence modern legal systems, particularly those that derive from civil law traditions. Several contemporary legal concepts can trace their origins to bonitary ownership, reflecting its enduring relevance.

  1. Good Faith Acquisition: Many modern legal systems incorporate the principle of good faith acquisition, where individuals who acquire property in good faith are afforded certain protections even if the transferor did not have full legal title. This principle is a direct descendant of bonitary ownership.
  2. Equitable Ownership: The notion of equitable ownership, where courts recognise and protect the interests of parties who do not hold formal legal title, echoes the concept of bonitary ownership. This is particularly evident in systems with a strong tradition of equity, such as English law.
  3. Usucapion (Adverse Possession): The concept of usucapion, or adverse possession, where continuous and undisputed possession of property for a statutory period can lead to full ownership, mirrors the process by which bonitary ownership could evolve into quiritarian ownership.
  4. Property Law Reforms: In jurisdictions undergoing property law reforms, the principles of bonitary ownership may influence the development of more flexible and inclusive ownership models. This is particularly relevant in contexts where formal property registration systems are underdeveloped or inaccessible to certain populations.

Case Studies and Jurisdictional Examples

To illustrate the application of bonitary ownership principles in modern legal contexts, consider the following case studies from different jurisdictions:

  1. French Civil Law: In French law, the concept of “possession vaut titre” (possession is equivalent to title) embodies principles similar to bonitary ownership. Possessors in good faith can acquire ownership after a certain period, reflecting the Roman usucapion principle.
  2. German Civil Code (BGB): The German Civil Code recognises the concept of “Eigentumserwerb durch Ersitzung” (acquisition of ownership through prescription), where continuous possession can lead to ownership. This mirrors the transition from bonitary to quiritarian ownership in Roman law.
  3. Common Law Systems: In common law jurisdictions, the principle of adverse possession allows individuals to acquire legal title through continuous and uncontested possession. This principle shares similarities with the evolution of bonitary ownership in Roman law.

Criticisms and Limitations

Despite its historical significance and influence, bonitary ownership is not without criticisms and limitations:

  1. Complexity: The distinction between bonitary and quiritarian ownership can be complex and may lead to legal uncertainty, particularly in systems that favour clarity and simplicity in property rights.
  2. Equitable vs. Legal Rights: The duality of equitable and legal rights inherent in bonitary ownership may create challenges in enforcement and recognition, especially in jurisdictions with less developed equitable doctrines.
  3. Modern Relevance: As legal systems evolve towards more unified and codified property laws, the relevance of bonitary ownership may diminish. The trend towards formal property registration systems may reduce the need for alternative forms of ownership.


Bonitary ownership, rooted in Roman law, is a unique form of ownership that combines equitable considerations with legal principles. Its historical significance and impact on modern legal systems highlight its importance in property law development. Although current legal frameworks may not explicitly acknowledge bonitary ownership, its principles still influence doctrines such as good faith acquisition, equitable ownership, and adverse possession.

As legal systems progress, the legacy of bonitary ownership demonstrates the adaptability and complexity of property rights. Understanding this concept offers valuable insights into the development of equitable doctrines and the protection of ownership rights in various legal contexts. Whether directly applied or influencing modern legal doctrines, bonitary ownership remains a cornerstone of property law’s rich tapestry.

Bonitary Ownership FAQ'S

Bonitary ownership refers to the legal ownership of property, where the owner has full rights and control over the property without any encumbrances or limitations.

Bonitary ownership differs from other forms of ownership, such as usufruct or bare ownership, as it grants the owner complete and unrestricted rights over the property.

Yes, bonitary ownership can be transferred through various means, such as sale, donation, or inheritance, as long as the necessary legal requirements are met.

Generally, there are no restrictions on bonitary ownership, unless specified by law or any contractual agreements. However, certain restrictions may apply in specific cases, such as protected cultural heritage sites or environmentally sensitive areas.

Bonitary ownership can only be revoked under exceptional circumstances, such as if the property was acquired through illegal means or if the owner fails to fulfill certain legal obligations related to the property.

Yes, bonitary ownership can be shared among multiple individuals through co-ownership agreements or joint ownership arrangements. Each co-owner will have their share of rights and responsibilities over the property.

If a dispute arises over bonitary ownership, it is advisable to seek legal assistance to resolve the matter. The resolution may involve negotiation, mediation, or, if necessary, litigation in a court of law.

Yes, bonitary ownership can be used as collateral for a mortgage or loan. The owner can grant a mortgage on the property to secure the repayment of the debt.

Tax implications related to bonitary ownership may vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances. It is recommended to consult with a tax professional to understand the applicable tax laws and obligations.

In certain cases, government regulations or zoning laws may impose limitations on the use or development of property, even if the owner holds bonitary ownership. It is important to be aware of such regulations and comply with them to avoid legal consequences.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 8th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Bonitary Ownership. DLS Solicitors. June 20 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Bonitary Ownership. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 20 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Bonitary Ownership. Retrieved June 20 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts