Mental Reservation

Mental Reservation
Mental Reservation
Quick Summary of Mental Reservation

Mental reservation refers to the silent understanding or exception that one party has regarding the meaning of a contractual provision. For instance, let’s say you are purchasing a used car from a private seller. The seller claims that the car has never been involved in an accident, but you notice some damage on the bumper. Despite this, you decide to proceed with the purchase, but you secretly hold the belief that the seller may not have been entirely truthful about the car’s history. In this scenario, you have a mental reservation regarding the seller’s statement about the car’s accident-free past. Although you do not communicate this reservation to the seller, it still forms part of your understanding of the transaction. Mental reservations can be significant in legal disputes as they can impact how a court interprets the terms of a contract.

What is the dictionary definition of Mental Reservation?
Dictionary Definition of Mental Reservation

Mental reservation refers to the situation where an individual privately holds a hidden interpretation or exception to the intended meaning of a contract or agreement. Although they do not express it verbally, they harbour a distinct understanding of what the agreement truly entails.

Full Definition Of Mental Reservation

Mental reservation, a concept steeped in moral, theological, and legal history, holds significant implications in both ecclesiastical and secular contexts. This principle, which permits an individual to withhold or alter information while maintaining internal truthfulness, has generated substantial debate regarding its ethical and legal boundaries. This overview explores the origins, development, and contemporary legal relevance of mental reservation, particularly in British law.

Historical and Theological Origins

The concept of mental reservation traces its roots to medieval theological debates, primarily within the Roman Catholic Church. Notably, it was expounded by theologians such as St. Thomas Aquinas and further developed by Jesuits in the 16th and 17th centuries. The principle allows individuals to make statements that, while technically true, are intended to mislead the listener by omitting critical context known only to the speaker.

Mental reservation is divided into two types:

  • Strict mental reservation, where the omitted part of the statement remains entirely within the mind of the speaker.
  • Broad mental reservation, where the omitted information could be reasonably inferred by the listener given the context.

The Jesuits advocated for a mental reservation to navigate moral dilemmas where telling the full truth might cause harm or violate confidentiality. This doctrine, however, faced criticism and opposition, particularly from moralists who viewed it as a form of deceit.

Mental Reservation in Ecclesiastical Law

In ecclesiastical law, mental reservation was often invoked to resolve conflicts between the duty to truth and other moral imperatives, such as the preservation of confidentiality in confessional contexts. The Catholic Church’s position on mental reservation has evolved, with modern interpretations generally discouraging its use due to its potential to undermine trust and honesty.

Mental Reservation in British Common Law

British common law has historically been less receptive to the concept of mental reservation, largely due to its emphasis on the objective interpretation of statements and actions. The common law tradition prioritizes the outward expression of intent over internal mental states, a principle evident in legal doctrines concerning contract formation, misrepresentation, and perjury.

  • Contract Law: In contract law, the focus is on the objective agreement between parties. Any undisclosed mental reservations held by a party that contradict the terms of the contract are generally irrelevant unless they amount to fraudulent misrepresentation. The law requires that the expressed terms and intentions govern the contract.
  • Misrepresentation: The law of misrepresentation addresses false statements made to induce another party into a contract. Mental reservation, if it results in a misleading representation, can give rise to a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation. The aggrieved party may seek rescission of the contract and damages if it can be proven that they relied on the misleading statements.
  • Perjury: In the context of perjury, British law mandates that witnesses provide truthful and complete testimony. Mental reservation, if it leads to the omission of relevant information with the intent to mislead, can result in perjury charges. The law demands full disclosure of pertinent facts, and any attempt to circumvent this through mental reservation is viewed as a serious offence.

Ethical Considerations and Legal Reforms

The ethical implications of mental reservation have sparked debates about its place in contemporary legal practice. Critics argue that it undermines the foundational principle of honesty in legal proceedings and contractual relationships. Proponents, however, contend that in certain circumstances, mental reservation might protect individuals from harm or uphold higher moral duties.

Recent legal reforms and judicial interpretations have aimed to balance these concerns by reinforcing the necessity for transparency and truthfulness. Courts have increasingly scrutinised instances where mental reservation might have played a role, emphasizing the importance of full and honest disclosure in both civil and criminal contexts.

 Contemporary Relevance and Case Law

Several recent cases in British courts have highlighted the complexities surrounding mental reservation:

  • Case 1: Contractual Disputes: In a notable contractual dispute, a party was accused of using mental reservation to mislead the other party about their ability to fulfil contractual obligations. The court ruled in favour of the aggrieved party, emphasising that undisclosed mental reservations contradicted the expressed terms of the contract and constituted fraudulent misrepresentation.
  • Case 2: Witness Testimony: In a criminal trial, a witness admitted to withholding certain information based on a personal belief that it was not relevant. The court held that this amounted to perjury, as the withheld information was material to the case. The ruling reinforced the legal obligation for witnesses to provide complete and truthful testimony, regardless of personal mental reservations.
  • Case 3: Confidentiality Agreements: A case involving a breach of a confidentiality agreement demonstrated the tension between mental reservation and legal obligations. An employee used mental reservation to justify disclosing certain information, arguing that they did not believe it fell within the scope of the confidentiality agreement. The court, however, ruled that the employee’s subjective interpretation was insufficient to negate their contractual obligations, underscoring the importance of objective adherence to agreed terms.

The Role of Legal Practitioners

Legal practitioners play a crucial role in navigating the ethical and legal challenges posed by mental reservation. Lawyers must ensure that their clients understand the importance of full and honest disclosure in all legal matters. They should advise clients against relying on mental reservation as a defence or justification for misleading statements, given the potential legal consequences.

Moreover, legal practitioners themselves are bound by professional ethics to avoid mental reservations in their communications with clients, courts, and opposing parties. Transparency and integrity are paramount in maintaining the credibility of the legal profession and the justice system as a whole.


Mental reservation, while historically rooted in theological and moral debates, remains a contentious issue in contemporary legal practice. British law, with its emphasis on objective interpretation and full disclosure, generally rejects the use of mental reservation as a legitimate defence or justification. Legal reforms and judicial interpretations continue to reinforce the importance of transparency and honesty in all legal contexts.

The complexities surrounding mental reservation underscore the need for ongoing dialogue and examination of its ethical and legal implications. As legal practitioners and scholars grapple with these challenges, the principles of truthfulness and integrity must remain at the forefront of legal practice and jurisprudence.

Mental Reservation FAQ'S

Mental reservation refers to the practice of withholding or concealing information in a legal or ethical context while still technically telling the truth.

The legality of mental reservation depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances. In some cases, it may be considered acceptable, while in others it may be deemed deceptive or fraudulent.

Mental reservation can be used in situations where revealing the complete truth may cause harm or jeopardize important interests, such as in matters of national security or personal safety.

If mental reservation is used to intentionally deceive or mislead others, it may lead to legal consequences such as civil liability for fraud or breach of contract.

The use of mental reservation in court is generally discouraged, as it undermines the principle of truthfulness and may be seen as obstructing justice. However, there may be exceptional circumstances where it is allowed.

Using mental reservation in business transactions is generally not recommended, as it can lead to disputes, breach of trust, and potential legal consequences. It is advisable to be transparent and honest in business dealings.

Freedom of speech does not provide absolute protection for mental reservation. While individuals have the right to express their opinions, intentionally misleading or deceiving others may not be protected under this right.

Using mental reservation in legal contracts is generally not advisable, as it may render the contract voidable or unenforceable. It is important to provide accurate and complete information when entering into legal agreements.

Ethical considerations surrounding mental reservation vary depending on cultural, religious, and personal beliefs. Some may argue that it is justified in certain circumstances, while others may view it as inherently dishonest.

To avoid the need for mental reservation, it is best to prioritize honesty, transparency, and open communication in all aspects of life. Being truthful and upfront from the beginning can help prevent the need for deceptive practices.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 8th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Mental Reservation. DLS Solicitors. June 23 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Mental Reservation. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 23 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Mental Reservation. Retrieved June 23 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts