What Does ‘Without Prejudice’ And ‘Subject To Contract’ Mean In Settlement Negotiations?

financial consent orders
What Does ‘Without Prejudice’ And ‘Subject To Contract’ Mean In Settlement Negotiations?

Settlement negotiations are a critical component of resolving disputes without the need for prolonged litigation. Two commonly used phrases in these negotiations are “without prejudice” and “subject to contract.” Understanding these terms is essential for anyone involved in legal disputes, as they have significant implications for the admissibility of communications and the binding nature of agreements.


When parties are embroiled in a dispute, the primary aim often becomes finding a resolution that is satisfactory to both sides. Settlement negotiations are a crucial tool in this process. However, to navigate these negotiations effectively, it’s important to understand the legal terminology that protects the interests of the parties involved. Two such terminologies are “without prejudice” and “subject to contract.” This blog post delves into the meanings, implications, and applications of these terms in settlement negotiations.

The Concept of ‘Without Prejudice’

Definition and Purpose

The term “without prejudice” is a legal term of art used to indicate that statements made in the course of settlement negotiations cannot be used as evidence in court if the negotiations fail and the dispute proceeds to litigation. The primary purpose of this principle is to encourage open and honest dialogue between disputing parties, fostering an environment where they can freely explore potential settlements without fear that their words will be used against them later.

Legal Framework

The “without prejudice” rule is grounded in public policy. It reflects the belief that parties should be able to negotiate settlements without concern that their offers or concessions will be perceived as admissions of liability. This rule is recognised in many jurisdictions and is a key feature of common law systems, including those in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and the United States.

Application in Practice

In practice, marking a communication “without prejudice” means that the communication cannot be submitted as evidence in court. For example, if a party sends a letter proposing a settlement, labelling it “without prejudice” ensures that if the settlement discussions break down, the letter cannot be used as proof of liability or a particular stance in court proceedings.

However, it’s important to note that not all communications marked “without prejudice” will automatically be protected. The content and context of the communication are also considered. For instance, if a communication is not genuinely part of a settlement negotiation, merely labelling it “without prejudice” will not grant it protection.

The Concept of ‘Subject to Contract’

Definition and Purpose

The phrase “subject to contract” is used to indicate that any agreement reached between the parties is not binding until a formal contract is signed. This term is particularly important in negotiations, as it allows parties to discuss and agree on terms without being legally bound until they have finalised and executed a formal agreement.

Legal Framework

“Subject to contract” operates as a safeguard in negotiations, ensuring that parties are not prematurely bound by terms they might later want to modify or clarify. It reflects the principle that a binding contract requires a meeting of the minds on all essential terms, which is usually evidenced by the signing of a formal contract.

Application in Practice

In settlement negotiations, when parties exchange communications that are marked “subject to contract,” they are effectively saying that they have not yet reached a final, binding agreement. This allows for further negotiation and refinement of terms before the parties commit to a formal contract. For example, if two companies are negotiating a settlement and their emails are marked “subject to contract,” either party can walk away or renegotiate terms until the final contract is signed.

Differences Between ‘Without Prejudice’ and ‘Subject to Contract’

While both “without prejudice” and “subject to contract” aim to facilitate smoother negotiations, they serve different purposes and operate in distinct ways.

  • Without Prejudice: Focuses on the admissibility of negotiation communications in court. It ensures that parties can negotiate freely without their statements being used against them in litigation.
  • Subject to Contract: Focuses on the binding nature of agreements. It ensures that parties are not legally bound by negotiation terms until a formal contract is signed.

Case Studies and Examples

Example 1: Employment Dispute

Consider an employment dispute where an employee is negotiating a severance package with their employer. The employee’s lawyer sends a letter proposing certain terms for the settlement, marked “without prejudice.” This means that if the negotiations fail, the letter cannot be used as evidence in court to show that the employee was willing to accept those terms.

Later, the employer agrees to some of the terms but wants further discussions on others. The employer replies, marking their response “subject to contract.” This means that while they are open to the proposed terms, they do not consider the agreement binding until a formal contract is signed.

Example 2: Commercial Litigation

In a commercial litigation case, two companies are negotiating a settlement to avoid a costly trial. The initial settlement offer from one company is marked “without prejudice,” protecting it from being disclosed in court if the settlement talks break down.

After several rounds of negotiation, they reach a provisional agreement on the settlement terms. The final email summarizing the terms is marked “subject to contract,” indicating that neither party is bound by the agreement until a formal settlement contract is signed.

Practical Tips for Using ‘Without Prejudice’ and ‘Subject to Contract’

When to Use ‘Without Prejudice’

  • During Initial Negotiations: Use “without prejudice” when making initial offers and counteroffers to ensure open dialogue.
  • Protecting Admissions: If discussing potential liabilities or admissions, mark communications “without prejudice” to prevent them from being used in court.
  • Clarifying Terms: When clarifying terms that might be perceived as admissions of fault, use “without prejudice.”

When to Use ‘Subject to Contract’

  • Provisional Agreements: When you have reached a provisional agreement on terms but need to finalise details, use “subject to contract.”
  • Draft Agreements: Use “subject to contract” when exchanging drafts of the agreement to make it clear that the document is not yet binding.
  • Final Negotiations: In final negotiations, use “subject to contract” to indicate that the deal is not binding until all parties sign a formal contract.


Understanding the terms “without prejudice” and “subject to contract” is crucial for effective settlement negotiations. These terms help protect parties during negotiations by ensuring that their communications cannot be used against them in court and that they are not prematurely bound by provisional agreements. By using these terms correctly, parties can engage in open, honest negotiations and reach mutually acceptable settlements without fear of adverse legal consequences.

In any legal dispute, clear communication and understanding of these terms can significantly enhance the negotiation process, leading to more efficient and satisfactory resolutions. As always, it’s advisable to seek legal counsel to navigate the complexities of settlement negotiations and ensure that these terms are used appropriately and effectively.

Further Reading

For those interested in delving deeper into the legal intricacies of these terms, consider exploring the following resources:

  • Legal Textbooks: Many legal textbooks provide detailed explanations and case law examples illustrating the application of “without prejudice” and “subject to contract.”
  • Law Journals: Academic journals often publish articles analysing recent developments and nuanced interpretations of these terms.
  • Practical Guides: Several legal practice guides offer practical advice and templates for using these terms in various legal contexts.

Understanding and properly applying “without prejudice” and “subject to contract” can make a significant difference in the outcome of settlement negotiations. These tools not only protect parties’ interests but also promote a more cooperative and flexible approach to resolving disputes.

Avatar of DLS Solicitors by DLS Solicitors
17th May 2024
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts
Related Posts
  • duty solicitor
    How To Get A Duty Solicitor At The Magistrates’ Court

    Discover how to secure a duty solicitor at the Magistrates' Court with DLS Solicitors. Learn about the process and requirements for accessing legal representation through the duty solicitor scheme. Get essential insights to navigate this important aspect of legal proceedings effectively.

  • How long does the probate process take?
    How long does the probate process take?

    Welcome to our detailed guide on the duration of the probate process. Understanding how long probate might take is crucial for executors and beneficiaries looking to manage their expectations and plan accordingly. This guide aims to provide you with a thorough overview, taking into account various factors that influence the timeline of probate proceedings. Understanding

  • How is Inheritance Tax calculated?
    How is Inheritance Tax calculated?

    Welcome to DLS Solicitors’ guide on how inheritance tax in the UK is calculated. Whether you are planning your estate, an executor of a will, or simply curious, understanding the basics of inheritance tax can provide clarity and aid in efficient financial planning. This comprehensive guide aims to demystify the process in a professional yet

  • grandparents rights
    Navigating Grandparents’ Rights: What You Need to Know

    Grandparents play a vital role in the lives of their grandchildren, providing love, support, and wisdom. However, when parents divorce or separate, disputes can arise over grandparents’ rights to see their grandchildren. Understanding the legal framework surrounding grandparents’ rights is crucial for all parties involved. In the United Kingdom, grandparents do not have an automatic