A Cancellando

A Cancellando
A Cancellando
Quick Summary of A Cancellando

A cancellando is derived from the Latin word “canceling” and pertains to the act of canceling a letter or document that was granted in violation of the law. The term originates from the lord chancellor or cancellarius, who presides over a chancery court and is referred to as a cancellando due to their responsibility of canceling the king’s letters patents when they are unlawfully granted.

What is the dictionary definition of A Cancellando?
Dictionary Definition of A Cancellando

A cancellando, derived from Law Latin, refers to the act of cancelling something, typically a legal document or letter, because it is granted in violation of the law. The term is often associated with the lord chancellor or cancellarius, who cancels the king’s letters patents when granted against the law. For instance, if the king granted a patent to an individual who did not meet the legal requirements, the lord chancellor would cancel the patent, or “cancellando” it, as it was granted unlawfully. Similarly, a court may cancel a contract as a cancellando if it was entered into under duress or fraud.

Full Definition Of A Cancellando

The term “A Cancellando” is rooted in Latin and historically used in legal documents to denote the annulment, cancellation, or revocation of certain rights, privileges, or contracts. This legal principle has evolved significantly, adapting to the nuances of modern legal systems, particularly in British law. This overview explores the origins, applications, and implications of “A Cancellando” within contemporary legal frameworks, addressing its procedural aspects, judicial interpretations, and relevance in various legal contexts.

Historical Context and Origins

“A Cancellando” derives from the Latin word “cancelare,” meaning to cross out or erase. In ancient Roman law, it was used to describe the formal process of annulling legal documents or decisions. The practice ensured that invalid or obsolete legal instruments had no enforceable power.

As Roman law influenced the development of legal systems across Europe, the concept of “A Cancellando” permeated various legal traditions. In Britain, the adoption of this principle can be traced back to medieval times, when it was integrated into the common law system. The ecclesiastical courts, dealing with matters such as marriage and wills, frequently employed this term to signify the revocation of ecclesiastical decrees.

Application in Contract Law

In contemporary British contract law, “A Cancellando” primarily refers to the cancellation or rescission of contracts. The grounds for contract cancellation can be diverse, including mutual consent, misrepresentation, duress, undue influence, or fundamental breach.

  1. Mutual Consent: Contracts may be cancelled if both parties agree to terminate the agreement. This mutual consent is typically documented in a cancellation agreement, ensuring neither party retains any obligations or rights under the original contract.
  2. Misrepresentation: If a contract is entered into based on false statements or fraudulent information, the aggrieved party may seek to cancel it. For misrepresentation to be a valid ground for cancellation, it must be material and induce the party to enter into the contract.
  3. Duress and Undue Influence: Contracts executed under duress or undue influence are voidable. Duress involves threats or coercion, while undue influence refers to abusing a position of power over another party, impacting their free will in agreeing to the contract.
  4. Fundamental Breach: A fundamental breach, or repudiatory breach, occurs when one party fails to perform their obligations to such an extent that it undermines the entire contract. The non-breaching party may cancel the contract and seek damages in such cases.

Judicial Interpretations and Case Law

British courts have provided significant clarity on applying “A Cancellando” through various landmark cases. Judicial scrutiny has evolved the interpretation and enforcement of contract cancellations, establishing precedents that guide current legal practices.

  1. Misrepresentation: In Derry v. Peek (1889), the House of Lords established the principle that fraudulent misrepresentation requires proof of deceitful intent. This case underlined the necessity of intent for misrepresentation to be actionable, influencing subsequent cases involving contract cancellation.
  2. Duress and Undue Influence: The case of Royal Bank of Scotland v. Etridge (No 2) (2001) provided critical guidelines on undue influence. The House of Lords held that banks must ensure that independent legal advice is given to individuals vulnerable to undue influence, particularly in guarantee agreements.
  3. Fundamental Breach: In Photo Production Ltd v. Securicor Transport Ltd (1980), the House of Lords delineated the concept of fundamental breach, ruling that a breach does not automatically terminate a contract unless the non-breaching party elects to do so. This case emphasised the necessity of an express intention to cancel the contract following a fundamental breach.

Procedural Aspects of Cancellation

The procedural requirements for invoking “A Cancellando” are crucial to ensuring the legal validity of the cancellation. The process typically involves:

  1. Notice of Cancellation: The party seeking cancellation must provide notice to the other party, explicitly stating the grounds for cancellation. This notice should be in writing and delivered through appropriate channels, such as registered posts or electronic communication, as the contract stipulates.
  2. Documentation: Detailed documentation supporting the grounds for cancellation is essential. This may include evidence of misrepresentation, proof of duress, or documentation of the fundamental breach.
  3. Legal Advice: Parties are advised to seek legal counsel to navigate the complexities of contract cancellation. Legal professionals can ensure that all procedural requirements are met and that the parties’ rights and obligations are clearly understood.
  4. Judicial Proceedings: In cases where mutual agreement cannot be reached, judicial intervention may be necessary. Parties may file a suit in the appropriate court, seeking a declaration of cancellation. The court will examine the evidence, interpret the contractual terms, and issue a ruling on the validity of the cancellation.

Implications and Consequences

The cancellation of a contract has significant legal and financial implications. Understanding these consequences is vital for parties considering or facing cancellation.

  1. Restitution: Upon cancellation, parties may be required to restore any benefits received under the contract. This principle of restitution aims to return the parties to their pre-contractual positions, ensuring that no unjust enrichment occurs.
  2. Damages: The non-breaching party may seek damages for losses incurred due to the breach leading to cancellation. These damages can include direct losses, such as costs incurred, and consequential losses, such as lost profits.
  3. Future Relations: A contract cancellation can impact future business relations. Parties must consider the reputational and relational consequences, particularly in industries where ongoing partnerships are crucial.
  4. Legal Precedents: Judicial rulings on contract cancellations contribute to the development of legal precedents. These precedents shape the interpretation and application of contract law, influencing future cases and legal practices.

Relevance in Other Legal Contexts

While contract law is the primary domain where “A Cancellando” is applied, its principles extend to other legal contexts within British law.

  1. Family Law: In family law, the annulment of marriages is a form of “A Cancellando.” Grounds for annulment include non-consummation, lack of consent, and pre-existing marriages. The annulment process is governed by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
  2. Wills and Estates: The revocation of wills and codicils also falls under “A Cancellando.” Testators may revoke a will by executing a new will, physically destroying the old will, or through a written declaration. The Wills Act of 1837 outlines the legal requirements for revocation.
  3. Administrative Law: In administrative law, licenses, permits, and governmental orders may be canceled under certain conditions. Judicial review processes allow individuals to challenge administrative decisions, seeking cancellation based on procedural or substantive grounds.
  4. Intellectual Property: Intellectual property law involves cancelling trademarks and patents. Grounds for cancellation include non-use, fraudulent registration, and violation of public order. The Intellectual Property Office and courts adjudicate such matters, ensuring that registrations comply with statutory requirements.

Contemporary Developments and Challenges

The concept of “A Cancellando” continues to evolve, adapting to contemporary legal challenges and developments. Technological advancements, globalisation, and changes in societal norms influence its application and interpretation.

  1. Digital Contracts: The rise of digital contracts and electronic signatures presents new challenges in contract cancellation. Ensuring the authenticity and integrity of digital documents is crucial, requiring updated legal frameworks and technological solutions.
  2. Consumer Protection: Enhanced consumer protection laws impact the cancellation of contracts, particularly in online transactions. Regulations such as the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 provide consumers with specific rights to cancel contracts within a cooling-off period.
  3. International Contracts: Globalisation has increased cross-border contracts, necessitating an understanding of international legal principles and jurisdictions. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) provides a framework for contract cancellation in international trade.
  4. Pandemic Implications: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for flexibility in contract law. Force majeure clauses and doctrines of frustration gained prominence as parties sought to cancel or renegotiate contracts impacted by unforeseen events. Courts have had to balance contractual obligations with the realities of the pandemic, shaping the future of “A Cancellando.”


“A Cancellando” remains a fundamental principle in British law, encompassing the cancellation or revocation of contracts and other legal instruments. Its historical roots and evolution through judicial interpretations underscore its significance in ensuring justice and fairness in legal relationships. As legal systems adapt to contemporary challenges, the principles and practices surrounding “A Cancellando” will evolve, reflecting the dynamic nature of law in society. Understanding the intricacies of this concept is essential for legal practitioners, scholars, and individuals navigating the complexities of modern legal frameworks.

A Cancellando FAQ'S

A cancellando is a legal term that refers to the act of canceling or annulling a legal document or contract.

In some cases, a cancellando can be reversed if both parties agree to reinstate the original document or contract.

The process for filing a cancellando varies depending on the specific legal document or contract involved. It typically involves submitting a formal request to the appropriate legal authority.

Yes, a cancellando can be contested in court if one party believes it was improperly executed or if there are grounds for challenging its validity.

The consequences of a cancellando depend on the specific legal document or contract involved. It may result in the termination of a business agreement, the nullification of a marriage, or the revocation of a will, among other outcomes.

While both terms involve the termination of a legal agreement, a cancellando typically refers to the formal annulment of a specific document or contract, whereas a cancellation may be more general.

If one party refuses to comply with a cancellando, the other party may need to seek legal recourse to enforce the annulment.

Grounds for requesting a cancellando may include fraud, duress, mistake, or other factors that invalidate the original agreement.

The ability to request a cancellando after a certain period of time has passed depends on the specific legal jurisdiction and the nature of the agreement in question.

While it is possible to file a cancellando without a lawyer, it is often advisable to seek legal counsel to ensure that the process is carried out properly and in accordance with the law.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 11th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-cancellando/
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):A Cancellando. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. June 22 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-cancellando/.
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):A Cancellando. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-cancellando/ (accessed: June 22 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):A Cancellando. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved June 22 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-cancellando/
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts