The empty-chair defence is a trial strategy in which a defendant attempts to shift all responsibility for the wrongdoing onto an individual who is not present in the courtroom. This individual may have settled the case prior to trial or may not have been named as a party at all.
The empty-chair defence is a legal tactic employed during trials with multiple parties. It entails one defendant attempting to shift all culpability onto a party who has already settled or plea-bargained prior to the trial, or onto an individual who was not named as a party. For instance, in a car accident case involving three drivers, the driver who caused the accident may utilise the empty-chair defence by blaming the driver who has already settled out of court or a pedestrian who was not involved in the accident. The defendant using this defence aims to persuade the jury that the absent individual is the one who should be held accountable for the incident. This strategy is frequently employed to sow confusion and uncertainty in the minds of the jury and to evade responsibility for their actions.
An empty-chair defence is a legal strategy where the defendant argues that someone who is not present in court is responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries or damages.
The subject of an empty-chair defence can be anyone who is not a party to the lawsuit, such as a third-party or an absent co-defendant.
The purpose of an empty-chair defence is to shift the blame for the plaintiff’s injuries or damages onto someone who is not present in court.
Yes, an empty-chair defence is a common legal strategy used in personal injury cases and other civil lawsuits.
Yes, an empty-chair defence can be successful if the defendant can convince the jury that the absent party is responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries or damages.
To support an empty-chair defence, the defendant must present evidence that the absent party was negligent or otherwise responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries or damages.
No, an empty-chair defence is not typically used in criminal cases because the defendant’s guilt or innocence is determined solely by the evidence presented in court.
Yes, an empty-chair defence can be used in cases where the plaintiff is partially at fault, as long as the defendant can show that the absent party was also responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries or damages.
Yes, an empty-chair defence can be used in cases where the plaintiff is seeking punitive damages, as long as the defendant can show that the absent party was responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries or damages.
Whether or not to use an empty-chair defence depends on the specific facts and circumstances of your case. It is important to consult with an experienced attorney to determine the best legal strategy for your case.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 27th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/empty-chair-defence/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Empty-Chair Defence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/empty-chair-defence/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Empty-Chair Defence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/empty-chair-defence/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Empty-Chair Defence. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/empty-chair-defence/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts