The necessity defence is a legal concept that allows individuals to justify their actions if they were necessary to prevent a greater harm or danger. It is often used as a defence in criminal cases where the defendant argues that their actions were necessary to protect themselves or others from imminent harm. The necessity defence requires the defendant to prove that they had no reasonable alternative and that the harm they were trying to prevent was greater than the harm caused by their actions. The acceptance of the necessity defence varies by jurisdiction and is subject to specific legal requirements and limitations.
The necessity defence is a legal argument that allows a defendant to claim that their actions were necessary to prevent a greater harm or danger.
The necessity defence can be used when a person reasonably believes that their actions were necessary to prevent imminent harm or danger, and there were no other reasonable alternatives available.
Examples of situations where the necessity defence may apply include breaking into a locked car to rescue a child trapped inside on a hot day or stealing food to prevent starvation in an emergency situation.
No, the necessity defence is not available for all crimes. It is typically only applicable to certain non-violent offenses, such as trespassing or theft, and is not available for serious crimes like murder or assault.
When determining if the necessity defence applies, factors such as the immediacy and severity of the harm, the availability of alternative courses of action, and the defendant’s belief in the necessity of their actions are considered.
The necessity defence generally requires that the harm or danger was imminent or immediate. If the harm was not immediate, it may be more difficult to successfully argue the necessity defence.
The necessity defence can still be used if the defendant caused harm to another person, as long as the harm caused was less severe than the harm that would have occurred if the defendant had not taken action.
If the defendant had other reasonable alternatives available to prevent the harm or danger, the necessity defence may not be applicable. The defence requires that there were no other reasonable options.
The necessity defence can be used even if the defendant’s actions were illegal, as long as they can prove that their actions were necessary to prevent a greater harm or danger.
The success of the necessity defence varies depending on the specific circumstances of each case and the jurisdiction in which it is being argued. It is ultimately up to the judge or jury to determine if the defence is valid and should be accepted.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 27th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/necessity-defence/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Necessity Defence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/necessity-defence/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Necessity Defence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/necessity-defence/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Necessity Defence. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/necessity-defence/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts