Define: A Bon Droit

A Bon Droit
A Bon Droit
Quick Summary of A Bon Droit

In Law French, “a bon droit” signifies acting with good reason or justly. It is employed to characterise a situation where something is rightfully deserved or earned. For instance, if an individual prevails in a court case, they may be granted costs a bon droit, indicating that they are entitled to those expenses due to their fair victory in the case.

What is the dictionary definition of A Bon Droit?
Dictionary Definition of A Bon Droit


A bon droit (ay or a bawndrwah), adv. [Law French] In a justified and rightful manner. Example: The plaintiff was granted damages as they had a bon droit claim against the defendant. Reason: In this case, the court recognised that the plaintiff had a rightful and legitimate claim against the defendant, which led to the awarding of damages.

Full Definition Of A Bon Droit

“A Bon Droit,” a term rooted in the principles of justice and rightful claims, translates from French to “with good right” or “by a good right.” This term is often invoked in legal contexts to denote actions or claims justifiable and grounded in law. This legal overview explores the concept of “A Bon Droit” through historical, philosophical, and practical lenses, shedding light on its significance in British legal tradition.

Historical Context

The origins of “A Bon Droit” can be traced back to medieval European jurisprudence, where the phrase was used to emphasise the legitimacy and righteousness of a claim. It was a declaration that one’s actions or assertions were supported by a lawful and moral foundation. In British law, adopting and adapting this principle reflects the country’s legal evolution, influenced by common law traditions and continental legal concepts.

During the medieval period, English law was profoundly influenced by Norman law after the Norman Conquest in 1066. The infusion of Norman legal principles brought a blend of Roman law, which heavily emphasised the importance of rightful claims and justice. “A Bon Droit” thus found its way into the legal lexicon, symbolising the convergence of moral righteousness with legal entitlement.

Philosophical Foundations

“A Bon Droit” aligns closely with natural law theory, which posits that certain rights are inherent in human nature and can be discerned through reason. As articulated by philosophers such as Thomas Aquinas, natural law argues that human laws should reflect these inherent moral principles. “A Bon Droit” embodies this intersection of morality and legality, asserting that lawful claims must be just and equitable.

John Locke, a pivotal figure in the development of British legal philosophy, further reinforced the idea that rights are intrinsic and that laws should safeguard these rights. Locke’s social contract theory posits that governments are instituted to protect the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. Within this framework, “A Bon Droit” can be understood as a declaration that one’s claim is not only legally valid but also morally sound.

Legal Applications

In contemporary British law, “A Bon Droit” manifests in various legal doctrines and practices. It is implicitly present in the principles of equity, which aim to achieve fairness and justice in situations where the strict application of common law might result in an unjust outcome. Historically separate from common law courts, equity courts were established to ensure that rightful claims received appropriate remedies.

  1. Equitable Remedies: Courts of equity, now integrated into the broader judicial system, often grant remedies such as injunctions, specific performance, and equitable estoppel. These remedies are grounded in “A Bon Droit,” ensuring that claimants receive what is rightfully theirs beyond mere monetary compensation. For instance, a court may order specific performance in contract disputes, compelling a party to fulfil their contractual obligations because monetary damages would not suffice to address the rightful claim.
  2. Human Rights Law: The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into British law. The Act enshrines fundamental rights and freedoms, such as the right to a fair trial and respect for private and family life. These rights embody the essence of “A Bon Droit,” providing a legal framework that protects individuals’ rightful claims against state interference.
  3. Property Law: In property disputes, the doctrine of adverse possession illustrates the application of “A Bon Droit.” Adverse possession allows a person to claim land ownership under certain conditions, reflecting that long-term, rightful use and stewardship of land can establish legal ownership. The claimant must demonstrate factual possession and an intention to possess, reinforcing their claim is just and rightful.
  4. Contract Law: The doctrine of promissory estoppel in contract law is another embodiment of “A Bon Droit.” This doctrine prevents a party from returning on a promise made, even if a formal contract does not exist when the other party has relied on that promise to their detriment. It ensures that rightful expectations and reliance interests are protected.

Case Studies

To illustrate the practical application of “A Bon Droit,” let us consider a few landmark cases in British law where this principle has played a pivotal role.

  1. Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130: This case established the doctrine of promissory estoppel. During World War II, the landlord agreed to reduce the rent for a tenant. After the war, the landlord sought to claim the original rent for the war years. The court held that the landlord was estopped from returning on his promise, as the tenant had relied on it. This case exemplifies “A Bon Droit” by ensuring the tenant’s reliance on the landlord’s promise was protected.
  2. Taylor Fashions Ltd. v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co. Ltd [1982] QB 133: This case extended the principles of equitable and proprietary estoppel. The plaintiffs substantially improved the property, believing they had a right to renew the lease. The court ruled in favour of the plaintiffs, recognising their rightful claim based on their reasonable reliance and the improvements made.
  3. R (on the application of Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26: In this human rights case, the House of Lords held that a prisoner’s rights to confidential legal correspondence were infringed by a blanket policy of cell searches. The ruling underscored the importance of upholding rightful claims to privacy and legal confidentiality, aligning with the principles of “A Bon Droit.”

Challenges and Criticisms

While “A Bon Droit” is a compelling concept, its application is not without challenges and criticisms. One major concern is the subjective nature of determining what is “rightful” and “just.” Legal systems strive for objectivity, but the inherent subjectivity in interpreting moral righteousness can lead to inconsistent outcomes.

Moreover, the balance between legal certainty and equitable discretion can be delicate. While equity aims to achieve fairness, excessive reliance on equitable principles can undermine the predictability and consistency of the law. This tension is evident in cases where the boundaries between legal rights and equitable remedies become blurred.


“A Bon Droit” encapsulates the essence of rightful claims and moral justice within the legal framework. Its historical roots and philosophical underpinnings reflect a longstanding commitment to ensuring lawful actions are just and equitable. British law manifests the principle in various doctrines and practices, from equitable remedies to human rights protections.

Through landmark cases and legal doctrines, “A Bon Droit” continues to shape the landscape of British jurisprudence, striving to harmonise legal entitlement with moral righteousness. However, the subjective nature of determining rightful claims and balancing legal certainty and equitable discretion present ongoing challenges.

Ultimately, “A Bon Droit” reminds us that the pursuit of justice in law is not merely about rigidly applying rules but about ensuring that those rules serve the greater purpose of fairness and equity. As British law evolves, the principle of “A Bon Droit” remains a cornerstone, guiding the legal system towards achieving lawful and morally sound justice.

A Bon Droit FAQ'S

A Bon Droit is a legal term that translates to “good right” in English. It refers to a legal principle that states that a person has a valid and justifiable claim or right.

To determine if you have A Bon Droit, you should consult with a qualified attorney who can assess the facts and circumstances of your case. They will analyse the relevant laws and legal precedents to determine the strength of your claim.

Yes, A Bon Droit can be used as a defence in a lawsuit. If you can prove that you have a valid and justifiable right or claim, it can help protect you from liability or adverse legal consequences.

If someone violates your A Bon Droit, you may have grounds to take legal action against them. This could involve filing a lawsuit to seek compensation for any damages or losses you have suffered as a result of the violation.

Yes, A Bon Droit can be waived or forfeited if the person with the right voluntarily gives it up or fails to assert it within a certain timeframe. However, the specific circumstances and applicable laws will determine if and when a right can be waived or forfeited.

A Bon Droit is similar to a legal entitlement, as both refer to having a valid and justifiable claim or right. However, A Bon Droit is a broader concept that encompasses various legal rights and claims, while a legal entitlement typically refers to a specific right granted by law.

In some cases, A Bon Droit can be transferred or assigned to another person. However, the transferability of rights depends on the specific laws and regulations governing the particular right in question.

Yes, A Bon Droit can be challenged or disputed by other parties. If someone believes that your claim or right is not valid or justifiable, they may contest it in court or through other legal means.

The duration of A Bon Droit varies depending on the specific right or claim involved. Some rights may be temporary, while others may be permanent or have a specific expiration date. It is important to consult with an attorney to understand the duration of your specific A Bon Droit.

Yes, A Bon Droit can be overridden by other laws or regulations if they are deemed to be in conflict. In such cases, the court will determine which law or regulation takes precedence based on the specific circumstances and legal principles involved.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 11th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):A Bon Droit. DLS Solicitors. June 16 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):A Bon Droit. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 16 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):A Bon Droit. Retrieved June 16 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts