A Confectione Praesentium

A Confectione Praesentium
A Confectione Praesentium
Quick Summary of A Confectione Praesentium

The term “confectione praesentium” is a Latin legal term that signifies that a contract is legally enforceable from when the indentures are made. For instance, the contract was binding a confectione praesentium, indicating its legal validity from when the indentures were created. This term is used to describe the legal status of a contract.

The term “consiliis” is another Latin legal term for someone who provides legal advice to a client. For example, a lawyer acted as a consiliis by offering legal guidance to the client. This term describes the role of a lawyer in providing legal advice.

“a contrario sensu” is a Latin legal term that denotes the interpretation of a law or legal concept in the opposite sense of its literal meaning. For instance, the court interpreted the law a contrario sensu, meaning it was understood in a manner contrary to its literal interpretation. This term describes a court’s interpretation of the law.

What is the dictionary definition of A Confectione Praesentium?
Dictionary Definition of A Confectione Praesentium

The term “confectione praesentium” is a Latin term used in legal settings to describe the creation of indentures, which are legal documents that bind two parties to a contract. It means “from the making of the indentures.”

Full Definition Of A Confectione Praesentium

“A Confectione Praesentium” may appear to be an archaic or obscure reference within legal contexts. However, it provides a rich basis for understanding various legal doctrines, especially those related to the presentation and preparation of evidence, documents, and various formalities in legal proceedings. This overview aims to clarify the historical context, legal principles, and modern applications of A Confectione Praesentium within the British legal system.

Historical Context

Origins and Evolution

“A Confectione Praesentium” is derived from Latin, translating roughly to “from the making or preparation of the present” in English. Historically, it referred to preparing and formally presenting legal documents and evidence. This concept has roots in Roman law, where the precise preparation and presentation of legal documents were crucial for validating transactions, agreements, and legal acts.

Over time, the principles of A Confectione Praesentium have influenced various aspects of British law. During the mediaeval period, the meticulous preparation and presentation of charters, deeds, and other legal instruments became fundamental to the legal process. This influence extended into the common law traditions that continue to shape the British legal system today.

Legal Principles

Formalities and Validity

At the core of A Confectione Praesentium lies the principle that certain formalities must be observed to ensure the validity of legal documents and evidence. This includes the proper drafting, signing, witnessing, and presenting documents. The rationale behind these formalities is to prevent fraud, ensure authenticity, and provide a clear record of legal transactions.

Modern British law reflects these principles in various statutory requirements and procedural rules. For example, the Law of Property Act 1925 mandates specific formalities for creating valid deeds, including the requirement for deeds to be signed, sealed, and delivered. Similarly, the Civil Procedure Rules outline the proper presentation and handling of evidence in civil litigation.

Evidence and Proof

The concept also extends to the realm of evidence and proof. In legal proceedings, the preparation and presentation of evidence must adhere to strict guidelines to be admissible in court. This includes ensuring the evidence is relevant, reliable, and properly authenticated.

The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, for example, sets out the framework for handling and disclosing evidence in criminal cases. This Act embodies the principles of A Confectione Praesentium by establishing clear protocols for preparing and presenting evidence to ensure its integrity and admissibility.

Document Execution

Another crucial area that A Confectione Praesentium influences is document execution. Legal instruments such as contracts, wills, and powers of attorney must be executed in accordance with specific legal requirements to be enforceable. This includes ensuring the parties involved have the requisite capacity and intent and have followed any statutory formalities.

For instance, the Wills Act 1837 stipulates that a will must be in writing, signed by the testator (or by another person in their presence and by their direction), and witnessed by at least two witnesses present at the same time. These requirements reflect the underlying principles of A Confectione Praesentium by ensuring the will’s authenticity and the testator’s intent.

Modern Applications

Electronic Documents and Signatures

With the advent of technology, the principles of A Confectione Praesentium have adapted to include electronic documents and signatures. The Electronic Communications Act 2000 and the Electronic Signatures Regulations 2002 provide the legal framework for using electronic signatures and documents, ensuring they are treated with the same validity as their paper counterparts.

These regulations require that electronic signatures be uniquely linked to the signatory, capable of identifying the signatory, created using means under the signatory’s sole control, and linked to the data to detect any subsequent changes. These criteria align with the traditional principles of ensuring authenticity, integrity, and non-repudiation in document execution.

Litigation and Procedural Rules

In litigation, the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and the Criminal Procedure Rules (CrimPR) embody the principles of A Confectione Praesentium by setting out the procedures for preparing, submitting, and presenting documents and evidence in court. These rules aim to ensure fairness, efficiency, and the proper administration of justice.

For example, the CPR requires that statements of case, witness statements, and expert reports be properly formatted, signed, and served on the other parties within specified time limits. The rules also provide for electronic filing and service, reflecting the adaptation of traditional principles to modern practices.

Conveyancing and Property Law

In conveyancing, the principles of A Confectione Praesentium are evident in the stringent requirements for the preparation and execution of documents related to the transfer of property. For instance, the Land Registration Act 2002 requires that certain transactions be completed using prescribed forms and procedures to ensure their validity and enforceability.

The requirement for deeds to be properly executed and registered directly applies these principles, ensuring that property transactions are transparent, reliable, and free from fraud. The use of electronic conveyancing systems further demonstrates the evolution of these principles to accommodate modern practices.

Case Law and Judicial Interpretation

Key Judgments

British case law has significantly influenced the interpretation and application of the principles of A Confectione Praesentium. Courts have consistently upheld the importance of adhering to formalities in the execution and presentation of documents and evidence.

In Moss v. Hancock (1899), the Court of Appeal emphasized the importance of proper deed execution, ruling that a deed not signed by the party bound by it was invalid. This judgment reinforced the principle that strict adherence to formalities is essential for the validity of legal instruments.

Similarly, in Goodman v. Eban (1954), the court highlighted the necessity of following procedural rules in presenting evidence. The judgment underscored that evidence not properly presented according to established procedures could be deemed inadmissible, reflecting the ongoing relevance of A Confectione Praesentium in ensuring the integrity of legal proceedings.

Statutory Interpretation

The interpretation of statutes related to document execution and evidence presentation often involves considerations of A Confectione Praesentium principles. Courts interpret these statutes to uphold the importance of formalities and procedural compliance.

For instance, the courts’ interpretation of the Wills Act 1837 has consistently reinforced the requirement for strict compliance with its formalities. In Re Groffman (1969), the court held that a will witnessed by only one person was invalid despite the testator’s clear intent. This decision underscored the principle that statutory formalities cannot be disregarded, even in the face of compelling evidence of intent.

Challenges and Criticisms

Rigidity and Flexibility

One of the primary criticisms of the principles underlying A Confectione Praesentium is their perceived rigidity. The strict adherence to formalities can sometimes lead to unjust outcomes, particularly in cases where there is clear evidence of intent or authenticity but minor procedural defects.

Courts have attempted to balance this rigidity with flexibility, particularly in equity. For example, the doctrine of substantial compliance allows for minor deviations from formalities if the essential requirements are met and there is no prejudice to the parties involved. However, this approach remains limited and case-specific.

Technological Advancements

The rapid advancement of technology poses both challenges and opportunities for applying A Confectione Praesentium principles. While electronic documents and signatures offer greater convenience and efficiency, they also raise concerns about security, authenticity, and the potential for fraud.

The legal framework has gradually adapted to these changes, but ongoing developments necessitate continuous legislation and judicial interpretation updates. Ensuring that electronic processes maintain the same level of integrity and reliability as traditional methods is a key challenge for modern legal systems.

International Considerations

In an increasingly globalised world, the principles of A Confectione Praesentium must also be considered in the context of international transactions and legal harmonisation. Different jurisdictions have varying requirements for document execution and evidence presentation, creating potential conflicts and complexities.

Efforts to harmonize these principles across borders, such as through international treaties and conventions, aim to provide greater consistency and predictability. For example, the Hague Convention on the International Recognition of Trusts seeks to standardize certain aspects of trust law, including formalities for executing trust documents.


The principles of A Confectione Praesentium, rooted in historical practices, continue to play a vital role in modern British law. These principles ensure the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of legal documents and evidence through adherence to formalities and procedural rules. While challenges and criticisms exist, particularly regarding rigidity and technological advancements, the legal system strives to balance these concerns with the need for certainty and fairness.

As the legal landscape evolves, the principles of A Confectione Praesentium will undoubtedly continue to adapt, ensuring their relevance and applicability in an ever-changing world. The ongoing dialogue between tradition and innovation will shape the future of these principles, maintaining their foundational role in the administration of justice.

A Confectione Praesentium FAQ'S

A Confectione Praesentium is a Latin legal term that translates to “from the making of the present.” It refers to the act of making a present or gift.

Yes, A Confectione Praesentium can be legally binding if all the necessary legal requirements for a valid gift are met.

The legal requirements for A Confectione Praesentium to be valid include the intention to make a gift, delivery of the gift, and acceptance of the gift by the recipient.

In general, A Confectione Praesentium cannot be revoked once the gift has been delivered and accepted, unless there are exceptional circumstances such as fraud or undue influence.

Yes, A Confectione Praesentium can be used in estate planning to transfer assets to beneficiaries as gifts.

A Confectione Praesentium involves the transfer of a gift without the expectation of something in return, while a contract involves an exchange of promises or obligations between parties.

A Confectione Praesentium can be challenged in court if there are disputes over the validity of the gift, such as the donor’s mental capacity or the delivery and acceptance of the gift.

Yes, there may be tax implications for A Confectione Praesentium, especially if the gift involves valuable assets or property. It is important to consult with a tax professional for advice on the tax consequences.

Yes, A Confectione Praesentium can be used to transfer real estate as a gift, but it is important to comply with the legal requirements for transferring real property.

While it is not always necessary to have a lawyer execute A Confectione Praesentium, it is advisable to seek legal advice, especially for complex or high-value gifts.

Related Phrases

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 11th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-confectione-praesentium/
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):A Confectione Praesentium. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. June 23 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-confectione-praesentium/.
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):A Confectione Praesentium. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-confectione-praesentium/ (accessed: June 23 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):A Confectione Praesentium. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved June 23 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/a-confectione-praesentium/
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts