Define: A Fortiori

A Fortiori
A Fortiori
Video Guide For A Fortiori
Quick Summary of A Fortiori

(ah-for-she-ory) prep. Derived from Latin, meaning for a still stronger reason; all the more.

Applies to a situation in which a second thing can be inferred to be true if the first thing is true. Therefore, if Abel is too young to serve as administrator, his younger brother Cain is definitely too young.

[Latin, With stronger reason.] This phrase is used in logic to denote an argument to the effect that because one ascertained fact exists, therefore another which is included in it or analogous to it and is less improbable, unusual, or surprising must also exist.

What is the dictionary definition of A Fortiori?
Dictionary Definition of A Fortiori

(ah-for-she-ory) prep. Latin for “with even stronger reason,” which applies to a situation in which if one thing is true, then it can be inferred that a second thing is even more certainly true. Thus, if Abel is too young to serve as administrator, then his younger brother Cain certainly is too young.

Full Definition Of A Fortiori

“A fortiori” is a Latin term meaning “from the stronger,” which is frequently employed in legal reasoning in the UK and elsewhere. It denotes an argument or inference that asserts that if a certain proposition is true in a particular case, then it must be even more so in another case where the circumstances are stronger or more compelling. In the context of UK law, the principle of “a fortiori” reasoning finds application in various legal domains, including statutory interpretation, case law analysis, and judicial reasoning.

To argue that something is even more true or certain than anything else is to use a fortiori. It implies that if one thing is true, then all that follows from it must also be true. As an illustration, if it is true that all dogs have four legs, then all golden retrievers must also have four legs, a fortiori. If someone contests whether the stronger argument actually supports the conclusion, they can still raise a counterargument to this kind of argument.

In statutory interpretation, “a fortiori” reasoning aids judges and legal practitioners in determining the scope and applicability of legislation. When faced with ambiguous or unclear statutory language, judges may resort to “a fortiori” reasoning to discern the legislative intent behind the law. For example, if a statute explicitly prohibits a certain action in a less severe scenario, courts may infer that the prohibition also extends to more severe scenarios, based on the principle that what is forbidden in a lesser situation is even more prohibited in a stronger situation. This application of “a fortiori” reasoning ensures consistency and coherence in statutory interpretation, promoting fairness and predictability in legal outcomes.

Moreover, “a fortiori” reasoning is frequently employed in case law analysis to draw analogies between precedents and the facts of a current case. When a court encounters a case with similarities to previous judicial decisions but with additional factors that make the present situation more compelling or severe, judges may apply “a fortiori” reasoning to extend the legal principles established in prior cases to the current matter. By recognising the greater strength or significance of the present circumstances compared to past cases, courts can justify the application of legal principles with greater force or certainty. This aspect of “a fortiori” reasoning contributes to the evolution and development of legal doctrines, ensuring that the law remains relevant and adaptive to changing societal needs and values.

Furthermore, “a fortiori” reasoning plays a crucial role in judicial decision-making by guiding judges in their evaluation of arguments and evidence presented by parties in litigation. When assessing the strength of a party’s case or the validity of a legal argument, judges may employ “a fortiori” reasoning to determine whether the logic or rationale presented withstands scrutiny under more stringent or demanding circumstances. By applying this form of reasoning, judges can discern the relative strength or weakness of legal positions and render judgements that are reasoned, coherent, and consistent with legal principles.

Additionally, “a fortiori” reasoning is integral to legal advocacy and persuasive argumentation in UK courts. Lawyers often employ this mode of reasoning to bolster their arguments and convince judges of the validity or soundness of their legal positions. By demonstrating that a particular legal proposition holds true in a less compelling scenario, advocates can then assert with even greater confidence that the same proposition applies with even greater force in a more compelling scenario, thereby strengthening their case and persuading the court to adopt their interpretation or position.

In summary, “a fortiori” reasoning occupies a central role in UK law, facilitating statutory interpretation, case law analysis, judicial decision-making, and legal advocacy. By recognising the logical principle that what holds true in a lesser scenario must hold even more so in a stronger scenario, “a fortiori” reasoning enhances the coherence, consistency, and predictability of legal outcomes, thereby promoting justice and the rule of law in the UK legal system.

A Fortiori FAQ'S

“A Fortiori” is a Latin term used in legal reasoning to indicate that a conclusion drawn from a given premise is even more valid or compelling when applied to a different, more extreme situation. It signifies that if a certain argument holds true in a particular circumstance, then it logically follows that the same argument is even stronger or more applicable in a related but more extreme circumstance.

In legal arguments, “A Fortiori” is employed to strengthen the logic or reasoning behind a particular legal principle or conclusion. It allows lawyers, judges, and legal scholars to extend the application of established legal principles from one scenario to another by highlighting the inherent logic or consistency between them.

Sure, for example, if a court has ruled that a particular action constitutes negligence in a standard situation, it may use “A Fortiori” reasoning to argue that the same action would undoubtedly be considered negligence in a more extreme situation where the risks and potential harm are heightened.

A Fortiori” differs from other legal reasoning methods, such as analogy or precedent, in that it specifically focuses on emphasising the logical strength or applicability of a legal principle across different scenarios based on their inherent similarities or differences in severity.

While “A Fortiori” may not be explicitly mentioned in legal documents or court proceedings, the underlying principle of strengthening arguments based on logical inference is indeed a common practice in UK legal reasoning. It may be implicitly used by legal professionals to bolster their arguments or interpretations of the law.

Like any form of legal reasoning, “A Fortiori” has its limitations. Its effectiveness depends on the strength of the underlying logical connection between the premises and the conclusions drawn. Additionally, “A Fortiori” arguments may not always be applicable or persuasive in every legal context, and they should be carefully tailored to the specific circumstances of each case.

Yes, “A Fortiori” reasoning, like any legal argument, can be subject to challenge and scrutiny in court. Opposing parties may contest the validity or applicability of the reasoning, presenting counterarguments or evidence to undermine its logic or conclusions.

To incorporate “A Fortiori” reasoning into legal arguments effectively, it’s essential to clearly articulate the logical connection between the premises and conclusions, provide supporting evidence or examples to strengthen the argument, and anticipate potential challenges or objections from opposing parties.

While specific cases may not explicitly cite “A Fortiori” reasoning, the underlying principle of strengthening arguments based on logical inference is prevalent in various legal precedents and judgments across UK Law. Legal professionals often use similar reasoning techniques to advance their arguments in court.

Legal textbooks, academic articles, and case law analyses may provide further insights into the use of “A Fortiori” reasoning and its application in UK Law. Additionally, consulting with legal experts or attending legal seminars and workshops may offer valuable opportunities to deepen your understanding of this legal reasoning method.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 12th April 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):A Fortiori. DLS Solicitors. May 20 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):A Fortiori. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: May 20 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):A Fortiori. Retrieved May 20 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Divorce Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts