Define: Absque Consideratione Curiae

Absque Consideratione Curiae
Absque Consideratione Curiae
Quick Summary of Absque Consideratione Curiae

The term “Absque consideratione curiae” refers to a scenario in law where a decision is reached without the court’s judgement or decision. This Latin phrase indicates that the decision was made without adhering to proper legal procedures or following the court’s rules.

What is the dictionary definition of Absque Consideratione Curiae?
Dictionary Definition of Absque Consideratione Curiae

Absque consideratione curiae, a Latin term in law, refers to a situation where a decision is made without the court’s involvement or a formal judgement. For instance, in the first example, the defendant was released from custody without a formal hearing or judgement from the court. Similarly, in the second example, the court denied the plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order without a formal judgement due to insufficient evidence.

Full Definition Of Absque Consideratione Curiae

“Absque Consideratione Curiae” is a Latin term historically used in common law, meaning “without the court’s consideration.” It represents a scenario where certain matters or decisions are taken without the court’s judgment or evaluation. This legal doctrine, while archaic, plays a significant role in understanding the development of legal principles regarding judicial discretion and procedural fairness. This essay explores the historical context, legal implications, and modern relevance of “Absque Consideratione Curiae” in British legal practice.

Historical Context

Origins in Common Law

The “Absque Consideratione Curiae” doctrine originates from medieval English common law, a system based on judicial decisions and customs rather than written statutes. In its early application, this principle signified instances where decisions or actions were taken outside the formal scrutiny of the court. It was a way to denote that certain acts did not require the court’s deliberation or were exempt from judicial review.

Application in Medieval Courts

In medieval courts, the king’s prerogative and other royal actions often fell under “Absque Consideratione Curiae.” These were decisions made by the sovereign without the need for judicial intervention. Over time, however, as the judiciary’s role expanded and the rule of law became more entrenched, the application of this doctrine diminished. The growing complexity of legal matters necessitated increased judicial oversight to ensure fairness and adherence to the law.

Legal Implications

Judicial Discretion

The “Absque Consideratione Curiae” concept underscores the balance between judicial discretion and procedural necessity. Historically, it highlighted areas where the court’s discretion was limited or unnecessary. In modern legal systems, judicial discretion is crucial, allowing judges to interpret and apply the law based on the specifics of each case. However, this discretion is bounded by legal frameworks and procedural rules to prevent arbitrariness and ensure consistency.

Procedural Fairness

The doctrine also touches upon procedural fairness, an essential principle in modern jurisprudence. Procedural fairness ensures that all parties in a legal proceeding receive a fair hearing and that decisions are made based on evidence and legal principles. By historically categorising certain matters as “Absque Consideratione Curiae,” it raised questions about the fairness and transparency of excluding judicial consideration in specific instances.

Modern Relevance

Administrative Law

In contemporary legal systems, the principles underlying “Absque Consideratione Curiae” find echoes in administrative law. Administrative decisions made by government bodies often do not require immediate judicial consideration but can be reviewed through judicial review processes. This ensures a balance between efficient administration and the protection of individual rights. The principle helps demarcate the boundaries between administrative discretion and judicial oversight.

Judicial Review

Judicial review is a mechanism through which courts examine the legality of administrative decisions and actions. While the initial decision might be made “Absque Consideratione Curiae,” judicial review safeguards against abuse of power. This process ensures that administrative bodies act within their legal bounds and respect fundamental rights and procedural fairness.

Case Law Analysis

Historical Cases

Historically, cases invoking “Absque Consideratione Curiae” often involved the king’s prerogative or other high authorities. Decisions regarding land grants, titles, and certain royal privileges were made without the need for judicial input. These cases illustrate the doctrine’s application in preserving certain powers exclusive to the sovereign or designated authorities.

Modern Cases

In modern jurisprudence, the concept is more nuanced. Cases involving administrative decisions, such as those by regulatory bodies or local councils, often initially fall outside direct judicial consideration. However, these can be brought before the court through judicial review if there are grounds for challenging their legality or fairness. Cases like “R (on the application of Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union” showcase the interplay between executive decisions and judicial scrutiny, highlighting the evolved application of principles similar to “Absque Consideratione Curiae.”

Comparative Analysis

Common Law Jurisdictions

In other common law jurisdictions, such as the United States, Canada, and Australia, principles like “Absque Consideratione Curiae” manifest differently. For instance, administrative decisions and executive actions often proceed without immediate judicial involvement but are subject to later review. The balance between efficient governance and judicial oversight is a common theme across these jurisdictions.

Civil Law Jurisdictions

In contrast, civil law jurisdictions, with their codified systems, approach the separation of powers and judicial oversight differently. Judicial review exists but often operates within a more rigid framework defined by statutes. The notion of certain decisions being outside immediate judicial consideration is less pronounced but still relevant in administrative discretion.

Theoretical Perspectives

Legal Formalism

From a legal formalist perspective, “Absque Consideratione Curiae” underscores the importance of strict adherence to established legal processes and categories. Legal formalism advocates for a clear separation of roles and responsibilities, where certain matters are definitively outside judicial purview, maintaining a structured and predictable legal system.

Legal Realism

Conversely, legal realism would critique “Absque Consideratione Curiae” for potentially ignoring the practical implications and fairness of excluding judicial consideration. Legal realists emphasize the need for the law to adapt to social realities and ensure justice, advocating for broader judicial oversight to address potential abuses of power and procedural unfairness.

Challenges and Criticisms

Arbitrary Exclusion

One of the main criticisms of “Absque Consideratione Curiae” is the potential for arbitrary exclusion of judicial oversight. This can lead to decisions being made without proper checks and balances, risking injustice and abuse of power. Ensuring that there are mechanisms for review and accountability is crucial to mitigate this risk.

Evolution of Legal Standards

As legal standards evolve, the rigid application of doctrines like “Absque Consideratione Curiae” becomes increasingly challenging. Modern legal systems emphasize transparency, accountability, and the protection of rights, necessitating a reevaluation of historical doctrines to align with contemporary values and principles.


“Absque Consideratione Curiae” is a historical artefact illustrating the evolution of judicial discretion and procedural fairness in the common law. While its direct application has diminished, the underlying principles continue to influence modern legal practices, particularly administrative law and judicial review. Understanding this doctrine provides valuable insights into the balance between judicial oversight and executive or administrative discretion, highlighting the ongoing need to ensure fairness, accountability, and justice within the legal system.

In the context of contemporary British law, the principles encapsulated by “Absque Consideratione Curiae” remind us of the importance of maintaining robust mechanisms for judicial review and oversight. These mechanisms ensure that all decisions, whether initially subject to judicial consideration or not, adhere to the rule of law and uphold the rights and interests of individuals and society as a whole.

Absque Consideratione Curiae FAQ'S

“Absque Consideratione Curiae” is a Latin term that translates to “without consideration of the court.” It refers to a legal principle where a court makes a decision without considering the arguments or evidence presented by one of the parties involved.

A court may make a decision “Absque Consideratione Curiae” when one party fails to appear or present their case, or when they fail to comply with court rules or orders.

If a decision is made “Absque Consideratione Curiae,” it means that the court has made a decision without considering the arguments or evidence of one party. This can result in an unfair outcome for the party whose case was not considered.

Yes, a decision made “Absque Consideratione Curiae” can typically be appealed. The party whose case was not considered can file an appeal to have the decision reviewed by a higher court.

To prevent a decision being made “Absque Consideratione Curiae,” it is crucial to comply with court rules and orders, appear at scheduled hearings, and present your case effectively. It is also important to communicate any difficulties or challenges you may face to the court in a timely manner.

Yes, a court can still make a decision “Absque Consideratione Curiae” even if you have legal representation. It is the responsibility of your legal representative to ensure that your case is properly presented and that all necessary documents and arguments are submitted to the court.

If you believe a decision was made “Absque Consideratione Curiae” in your case, you should consult with your attorney and discuss the possibility of filing an appeal. Your attorney can guide you through the process and help you determine the best course of action.

In certain situations, such as when a party repeatedly fails to comply with court orders or intentionally avoids participating in the legal proceedings, a court may make a decision “Absque Consideratione Curiae” as a last resort. However, this is generally seen as a measure of last resort and is not favored by the legal system.

As a party to a legal proceeding, you generally cannot request a decision to be made “Absque Consideratione Curiae.” The court is obligated to consider the arguments and evidence presented by both parties before making a decision.

“Absque Consideratione Curiae” is not a commonly used legal term in modern legal practice. It is more commonly found in historical legal texts and may be used in specific circumstances where a party’s non-compliance or absence from court proceedings is an issue.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 11th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Absque Consideratione Curiae. DLS Solicitors. June 12 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Absque Consideratione Curiae. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 12 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Absque Consideratione Curiae. Retrieved June 12 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts