The admission of evidence refers to the judge’s decision on whether to allow specific information or objects to be used as evidence in a trial.
The process in which a judge considers whether to accept evidence in a trial is known as the admission of evidence. For instance, in a murder trial, the prosecution may present a knife as evidence. The judge’s role is to determine the relevance and reliability of the evidence. In the given example, the judge must assess whether the knife is pertinent to the case and if it was obtained lawfully. If the judge decides to admit the knife as evidence, both the prosecution and defence can utilise it during the trial.
Generally, illegally obtained evidence is not admissible in court. The exclusionary rule prohibits the use of evidence obtained through illegal searches or seizures.
The “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine is a legal principle that states evidence derived from illegally obtained evidence is also inadmissible in court.
In most cases, evidence obtained through a warrantless search is considered inadmissible unless it falls under certain exceptions, such as exigent circumstances or consent.
If a suspect’s Miranda rights are violated during the interrogation process, any statements or evidence obtained as a result may be deemed inadmissible in court.
Evidence obtained through an illegal wiretap is generally not admissible in court. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, including unauthorized wiretapping.
Evidence obtained through entrapment, where law enforcement induces someone to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed, may be deemed inadmissible in court.
In most cases, evidence obtained through a search conducted without a valid search warrant is considered inadmissible unless it falls under certain exceptions, such as consent or plain view.
If law enforcement conducts an illegal stop and frisk without reasonable suspicion, any evidence obtained as a result may be deemed inadmissible in court.
If a defendant’s right to counsel is violated during the pre-trial or trial process, any evidence obtained as a result may be deemed inadmissible in court.
If evidence is obtained through a violation of an individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy, it may be deemed inadmissible in court under the Fourth Amendment.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/admission-of-evidence/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Admission Of Evidence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/admission-of-evidence/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Admission Of Evidence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/admission-of-evidence/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Admission Of Evidence. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/admission-of-evidence/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts