Define: After-Discovered Evidence

After-discovered evidence refers to evidence that becomes available after a trial has concluded, which was not known or available to the parties during the trial proceedings. This evidence may come to light as a result of diligent efforts by one of the parties, new developments in a case, or the discovery of previously unavailable information.

In legal proceedings, the discovery of after-discovered evidence can be significant, as it may have the potential to impact the outcome of a case, particularly if it is material to the issues at hand. However, the admissibility of after-discovered evidence varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case.

Courts generally apply certain criteria to determine whether after-discovered evidence should be admitted, including whether the evidence could not have been discovered earlier with reasonable diligence, whether it is material to the issues in the case, and whether its admission would likely result in a different outcome if the case were retried.

Parties seeking to introduce after-discovered evidence typically must follow specific procedural rules and seek permission from the court to reopen the case or present the new evidence. Courts have discretion in deciding whether to admit after-discovered evidence, balancing the interests of fairness, finality, and the integrity of the judicial process.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 29th March 2024.