Agency By Necessity

Agency By Necessity
Agency By Necessity
Quick Summary of Agency By Necessity

Agency by necessity is a legal concept that arises when a person (the agent) acts on behalf of another person (the principal) without their prior authorization or consent, but under circumstances where it is necessary to protect the principal’s interests. This agency relationship is created by operation of law and is based on the principle that it is better to have someone act on behalf of the principal in an emergency or urgent situation than to leave the principal’s interests unprotected.

For agency by necessity to be established, certain conditions must be met. Firstly, there must be a real and imminent necessity for the agent to act on behalf of the principal. This necessity typically arises in situations where the principal is unable to act themselves, such as when they are incapacitated, absent, or unable to communicate. Secondly, the agent must act in good faith and in the best interests of the principal, with the intention of protecting their interests. Lastly, the agent’s actions must be reasonable and proportionate to the circumstances.

When agency by necessity is established, the agent is granted certain powers and authority to act on behalf of the principal. These powers are limited to what is necessary to address the specific emergency or urgent situation. The agent is expected to act with reasonable care and skill, and they may be held liable for any negligence or misconduct in the performance of their duties.

The agency relationship created by necessity is temporary and terminates once the necessity no longer exists. The principal is not bound by any contracts or obligations entered into by the agent unless they choose to ratify them after the fact. However, the principal may be held liable for the agent’s actions if they receive a benefit from those actions.

Overall, agency by necessity provides a legal framework to protect the interests of a principal in emergency situations where they are unable to act themselves. It allows for someone to step in and make decisions on their behalf, ensuring that their interests are safeguarded.

What is the dictionary definition of Agency By Necessity?
Dictionary Definition of Agency By Necessity

Agency by necessity is a legal concept that arises when an individual (the agent) acts on behalf of another person (the principal) without explicit authority or consent, but out of necessity to protect the principal’s interests. This situation typically occurs when the principal is unable to act or make decisions due to physical or mental incapacity, emergency circumstances, or unforeseen events. In such cases, the agent assumes responsibility and authority to act in the best interests of the principal, making decisions and entering into contracts on their behalf. Agency, by necessity, is recognised to ensure that the principal’s affairs are properly managed and protected when they are unable to do so themselves.

Full Definition Of Agency By Necessity

Agency by necessity is a legal doctrine that permits an individual to act on behalf of another person in urgent or emergency situations without the latter’s prior consent or explicit authorization. This concept is deeply embedded in the law of agency, a branch of commercial law dealing with relationships where one party (the agent) acts on behalf of another party (the principal). This overview will delve into the intricacies of agency by necessity, examining its historical roots, legal requirements, applications, limitations, and significant case law.

Historical Background

The concept of agency by necessity can be traced back to maritime law, where shipmasters were often compelled to make critical decisions in emergencies to protect the interests of the shipowners. Over time, this principle extended beyond maritime contexts to cover various commercial and personal situations requiring immediate action to avert significant harm or loss.

Legal Foundations

Agency by necessity is predicated on the principle that, in certain situations, it is reasonable and justifiable for one person to act on behalf of another to prevent significant detriment. The legal foundation of this doctrine rests on three primary conditions:

  • Imminent Necessity: There must be an urgent situation requiring immediate action. The necessity must be so pressing that it leaves no time to obtain the principal’s instructions.
  • Interest of the Principal: The agent’s actions must be intended to protect or further the principal’s interests. The agent must act in good faith, prioritising the principal’s benefit over their own.
  • Impossibility of Communication: It must be impossible or impracticable to obtain the principal’s consent or instructions within the time available. This impossibility of communication legitimises the agent’s unilateral decision-making.

Applications of Agency by Necessity

Agency by necessity can arise in various contexts, including commercial transactions, personal relationships, and emergency situations. Here are some common applications:

  • Maritime Law: Historically, shipmasters have acted as agents of necessity when dealing with emergencies at sea, such as making port in distress or selling cargo to pay for repairs.
  • Sale of Perishable Goods: If an agent has perishable goods and cannot contact the principal, they may sell the goods to prevent them from spoiling and losing all value.
  • Medical Emergencies: In healthcare, a doctor may perform a life-saving operation on an unconscious patient without prior consent, acting as an agent of necessity.
  • Commercial Transactions: In commercial law, an agent might take actions to mitigate losses in a transaction if communication with the principal is not feasible.

Legal Requirements

For agency by necessity to be legally recognised, the following criteria typically must be satisfied:

  • Existence of a Genuine Emergency: The situation must be a genuine necessity, where immediate action is crucial to prevent significant harm or loss.
  • Reasonableness of Actions: The actions taken by the agent must be reasonable and proportionate to the emergency. The agent must not exceed the scope of what is necessary to protect the principal’s interests.
  • Benefit to the Principal: The agent’s actions must directly benefit the principal, aiming to protect their interests or mitigate potential losses.
  • Inability to Communicate: There must be clear evidence that it was impossible or impracticable to promptly obtain the principal’s instructions.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its practical utility, the doctrine of agency by necessity has limitations and is subject to various criticisms:

  • Strict Interpretation: Courts tend to strictly interpret the conditions for agency by necessity strictly, often requiring clear evidence of an emergency and the impossibility of communication. This restricts its applicability to genuinely exceptional cases.
  • Potential for Abuse: There is a risk that agents may misuse the doctrine to justify unauthorised actions under the guise of necessity. This potential for abuse necessitates careful judicial scrutiny.
  • Ambiguity and Uncertainty: The concept of necessity can be subjective, leading to ambiguity and uncertainty in its application. What constitutes a genuine emergency or reasonable action can vary, complicating legal assessments.
  • Technological Advancements: In an era of advanced communication technologies, the argument of the impossibility of communication is increasingly difficult to substantiate, further limiting the applicability of agency by necessity.

Significant Case Law

Several landmark cases have shaped the understanding and application of agency by necessity in British law. Here are some notable examples:

  • Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield (1874): In this case, a railway company, unable to contact the owner of a horse, arranged for the horse’s stabling to prevent it from wandering and potentially getting harmed. The court held that the railway company acted as an agent of necessity, and the owner was liable for the stabling costs.
  • Springer v Great Western Railway Co (1921): This case involved the sale of perishable goods. The railway company, unable to contact the owner, sold the goods to prevent them from spoiling. The court upheld the company’s action as a valid exercise of agency by necessity.
  • China Pacific SA v Food Corporation of India (1982): This maritime case reaffirmed that a shipmaster can act as an agent of necessity. Here, a shipmaster incurred expenses to save a cargo of rice at risk due to a delay. The court supported the shipmaster’s decision, emphasising the necessity and reasonableness of the actions taken.

Agency by Necessity in Modern Context

In contemporary legal practice, agency by necessity remains relevant, though its application is relatively rare due to stringent legal requirements and technological advancements in communication. However, it still plays a crucial role in specific scenarios:

  • Healthcare Decisions: Doctors and healthcare providers rely on this doctrine to make critical decisions for patients who cannot consent, particularly in emergencies.
  • Commercial Shipping: In maritime law, shipmasters continue to exercise agency by necessity in dealing with unforeseen emergencies at sea.
  • International Trade: In international trade, agents may invoke this doctrine to handle perishable goods or mitigate losses when immediate communication with principals is not feasible.

Comparative Perspectives

Agency by necessity is recognised in various legal systems worldwide, though the specifics of its application can differ. For example:

  • United States: American law acknowledges agency by necessity under similar emergency conditions and benefits to the principal. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides guidelines for actions taken in emergencies, particularly concerning perishable goods.
  • European Union: EU member states have their own interpretations and applications of agency by necessity, often aligned with common law principles but adapted to local legal frameworks and commercial practices.
  • Commonwealth Countries: Many Commonwealth countries, influenced by British legal traditions, incorporate the doctrine of agency by necessity, applying it in maritime law, commercial transactions, and emergency healthcare decisions.


Agency by necessity is a crucial yet narrowly defined doctrine within the broader law of agency. It protects the interests of principals in urgent situations where immediate action is essential and communication is impossible. While its application is limited by stringent legal requirements and potential for abuse, it remains a vital tool in specific contexts, such as maritime law and emergency healthcare. Understanding its historical roots, legal foundations, and contemporary relevance is essential for legal practitioners and scholars navigating the complexities of agency law.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 16th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Agency By Necessity. DLS Solicitors. June 23 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Agency By Necessity. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 23 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Agency By Necessity. Retrieved June 23 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts