Define: Anti Takeover Defence

Anti Takeover Defence
Anti Takeover Defence
What is the dictionary definition of Anti Takeover Defence?
Dictionary Definition of Anti Takeover Defence

Anti Takeover Defense:

An anti takeover defence refers to a set of strategies and measures implemented by a company’s management and board of directors to protect the organisation from hostile takeover attempts. These defences are designed to deter or impede the acquisition of a company by an unwelcome bidder, thereby safeguarding the interests of existing shareholders and preserving the independence and control of the target company.

Anti takeover defences can take various forms, including structural defences, such as poison pills, staggered boards, and dual-class share structures, as well as contractual defences, such as golden parachutes and lock-up agreements. These mechanisms are intended to make it more difficult or costly for potential acquirers to gain control of the target company, often by diluting the acquirer’s ownership or imposing significant financial penalties.

While anti takeover defences can be controversial and may limit the potential for shareholder value maximization, they are often implemented to ensure that the company’s long-term strategic goals and objectives are not compromised by short-term interests or opportunistic takeovers. The effectiveness and legality of anti takeover defences vary across jurisdictions, and their implementation requires careful consideration of corporate governance principles and shareholder rights.

Full Definition Of Anti Takeover Defence

Anti-takeover defence refers to a set of strategies and measures implemented by a company’s management and board of directors to protect the company from hostile takeover attempts. These defences are designed to deter or impede the acquisition of a controlling interest in the company by an unwelcome acquirer.

Common anti-takeover defences include poison pills, staggered boards, golden parachutes, and dual-class share structures. Poison pills are provisions that allow existing shareholders to purchase additional shares at a discounted price, diluting the acquirer’s ownership stake and making the takeover more expensive. Staggered boards are boards of directors where only a portion of the directors are up for election each year, making it difficult for an acquirer to gain control of the entire board at once. Golden parachutes are lucrative compensation packages for executives in the event of a change in control, providing them with financial incentives to resist a takeover. Dual-class share structures give certain shareholders, typically founders or insiders, greater voting power than other shareholders, making it harder for an acquirer to gain control.

While anti-takeover defences can be effective in thwarting hostile takeovers, they have also been subject to scrutiny and criticism. Critics argue that these defences entrench management and limit shareholder rights, potentially harming shareholder value. In some jurisdictions, such as the United States, courts have imposed limitations on certain anti-takeover defences to ensure that they are not used to unduly impede legitimate takeover offers.

Overall, anti-takeover defences play a significant role in corporate governance and can have important implications for shareholders and the market. Companies must carefully consider the legal and regulatory framework in their jurisdiction when implementing these defences to strike a balance between protecting shareholder interests and maintaining accountability to shareholders.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 6th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Anti Takeover Defence. DLS Solicitors. June 12 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Anti Takeover Defence. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 12 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Anti Takeover Defence. Retrieved June 12 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts