Define: Bail Revocation

Bail Revocation
Bail Revocation
Quick Summary of Bail Revocation

If a person is accused of a crime, they may be released from jail by paying bail, which serves as a guarantee that they will return for their trial. However, if the person violates the terms of their bail, such as committing another crime or failing to appear in court, the judge can revoke their bail. This is known as bail revocation.

What is the dictionary definition of Bail Revocation?
Dictionary Definition of Bail Revocation

Bail revocation occurs when a court cancels the previously granted bail for a criminal defendant. For instance, if a person violates the conditions of their release, such as by committing another offence or failing to appear in court, the court may choose to revoke their bail. Consequently, the individual will be taken back into custody until their trial or sentencing. This is a significant repercussion for a defendant who was previously released on bail, as it means they can no longer remain free while awaiting their trial or sentencing. The provided examples demonstrate how a defendant’s actions can result in the cancellation of their bail and the subsequent consequences they face.

Full Definition Of Bail Revocation

Bail, an integral aspect of the criminal justice system, allows a defendant to remain free until their trial. However, bail is not an absolute right and can be revoked under certain conditions. Bail revocation refers to the process whereby a court withdraws the bail previously granted to a defendant, necessitating their return to custody. This comprehensive legal overview examines the principles, procedures, and implications of bail revocation in the context of British law.

The Legal Framework of Bail

Bail in the United Kingdom is governed by several statutes, with the primary legislation being the Bail Act 1976. This Act, along with subsequent amendments and case law, provides the framework for granting, refusing, and revoking bail.

Under the Bail Act 1976, there is a general presumption in favour of bail, particularly for defendants who have not been convicted. The court must consider various factors, including the nature and seriousness of the offence, the character and antecedents of the defendant, and the likelihood of the defendant failing to surrender, committing further offences, or interfering with witnesses.

Grounds for Bail Revocation

Bail can be revoked on several grounds, broadly categorised into statutory and discretionary grounds:

Statutory Grounds

  • Failure to Surrender: One of the primary statutory grounds for bail revocation is the defendant’s failure to surrender to custody at the appointed time. This failure can be either intentional or due to circumstances beyond the defendant’s control.
  • Committing Further Offences: If a defendant commits another offence while on bail, this provides a strong ground for revocation. The rationale is to prevent further criminal activity and protect the public.
  • Interference with Witnesses or Obstruction of Justice: Any attempt by the defendant to interfere with witnesses or obstruct the course of justice can lead to bail being revoked. This includes intimidating witnesses or tampering with evidence.
  • Breach of Bail Conditions: Conditions are often attached to bail to mitigate the risk of absconding, reoffending, or interference with justice. Breaching these conditions, such as violating a curfew or failing to report to a police station, can result in revocation.

Discretionary Grounds

  • Change in Circumstances: A significant change in circumstances since bail was granted can lead to revocation. This might include new evidence that strengthens the prosecution’s case or changes in the defendant’s situation that increase the risk of absconding.
  • Seriousness of the Offence: In some cases, the gravity of the offence and the potential for a lengthy custodial sentence may justify revoking bail, particularly if it is believed that the defendant might flee.
  • Risk to the Public: If new information comes to light indicating that the defendant poses a heightened risk to the public, the court may decide to revoke bail to prevent harm.

Procedure for Bail Revocation

The procedure for bail revocation involves several steps, ensuring that the defendant’s rights are balanced against the need for justice and public safety.

Application for Revocation

Applications for bail revocation can be made by the prosecution or, in some cases, by the police. The application must be supported by evidence demonstrating that one or more grounds for revocation are met. The court will then consider whether the evidence justifies revoking bail.


A bail revocation hearing is conducted where the prosecution presents its case for revocation and the defendant is given an opportunity to respond. The hearing is adversarial, with both sides presenting evidence and arguments.

The court must be satisfied that the grounds for revocation are met on the balance of probabilities. This standard is lower than the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt, reflecting the nature of bail proceedings as a preliminary measure rather than a final determination of guilt.

Judicial Decision

The court’s decision to revoke bail must be made judiciously, considering all relevant factors and ensuring that the defendant’s rights are protected. The decision can be appealed, providing an additional safeguard against arbitrary or unjust revocation.

Implications of Bail Revocation

The revocation of bail has significant implications for both the defendant and the criminal justice system.

For the Defendant

  • Loss of Liberty: The most immediate consequence for the defendant is the loss of liberty, as they are remanded into custody until their trial. This can have far-reaching effects on their personal and professional life.
  • Impact on Defence Preparation: Being in custody can hinder the defendant’s ability to prepare their defence, access legal resources, and communicate with their legal team.
  • Presumption of Innocence: Although bail revocation is a procedural decision, it can create a perception of guilt, undermining the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

For the Criminal Justice System

  • Resource Allocation: Revoking bail and remanding defendants into custody places additional demands on the prison system and judicial resources.
  • Public Confidence: Effective bail management, including the revocation of bail when justified, is crucial for maintaining public confidence in the justice system’s ability to protect the community and ensure fair trials.

Legal Safeguards and Rights

Several legal safeguards exist to protect the rights of defendants in bail revocation proceedings:

  • Right to a Fair Hearing: Defendants have the right to a fair and public hearing where they can challenge the evidence and arguments presented by the prosecution.
  • Right to Legal Representation: Defendants are entitled to legal representation during bail revocation proceedings, ensuring they can effectively present their case.
  • Right to Appeal: Decisions to revoke bail can be appealed to a higher court, providing a mechanism for reviewing and potentially overturning unjust decisions.
  • Periodic Review: Defendants in custody are entitled to periodic reviews of their bail status, allowing for reconsideration if circumstances change.

Case Law and Judicial Interpretations

Case law plays a vital role in shaping the practice and interpretation of bail revocation. Several landmark cases have established important principles:

R v. Mansfield Justices, ex parte Sharkey (1985)

In this case, the court emphasised that bail should not be revoked lightly and that the prosecution must provide clear evidence to justify revocation. The case underscored the importance of safeguarding the defendant’s rights and the presumption of innocence.

R v. Nottingham Justices, ex parte Davies (1981)

This case highlighted that the risk of absconding must be substantial and real to warrant bail revocation. Mere suspicion or unsubstantiated fears are insufficient grounds.

R v. Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Fernandez (1971)

The court in this case ruled that the seriousness of the offence alone is not enough to justify bail revocation. There must be specific reasons, such as a high risk of reoffending or interference with witnesses.

International Perspectives and Comparisons

The approach to bail revocation in the UK can be compared to practices in other jurisdictions to provide a broader perspective.

United States

In the United States, bail revocation procedures vary by state but generally involve a similar balance between protecting the community and respecting the defendant’s rights. The Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution prohibits excessive bail, influencing revocation decisions.


Canadian law, under the Criminal Code, also allows for bail revocation on grounds similar to those in the UK. However, Canada places a strong emphasis on the principle of restraint, encouraging alternatives to detention whenever possible.

European Union

EU member states have diverse bail systems, but the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) sets common standards. Article 5 of the ECHR protects the right to liberty and security, influencing bail and revocation practices across Europe.


Bail revocation is a complex and crucial aspect of the criminal justice system, balancing the defendant’s right to liberty against the need to protect the public and ensure the integrity of the judicial process. The legal framework in the UK, anchored by the Bail Act 1976 and enriched by case law, provides robust mechanisms to manage this balance.

Effective bail management requires careful consideration of statutory and discretionary grounds for revocation, rigorous procedural safeguards, and a commitment to fairness and justice. By upholding these principles, the legal system can ensure that bail revocation serves its intended purpose without compromising the fundamental rights of defendants.

In an ever-evolving legal landscape, continuous review and adaptation of bail policies and practices are essential to address emerging challenges and uphold public confidence in the justice system. Through this dynamic approach, the UK can maintain a fair, effective, and just bail system that respects the rights of all parties involved.

Bail Revocation FAQ'S

Yes, bail can be revoked if the defendant violates any of the conditions set by the court or if new evidence emerges that suggests the defendant is a flight risk or a danger to the community.

Common reasons for bail revocation include failure to appear in court, committing new crimes while on bail, violating restraining orders, tampering with witnesses or evidence, or leaving the jurisdiction without permission.

In some cases, bail can be revoked without a hearing if the violation is clear and uncontested. However, in most cases, the defendant is entitled to a hearing where they can present their side of the story.

The judge who initially granted bail has the authority to revoke it. However, in some cases, the prosecution may request bail revocation, and the judge will make the final decision.

Yes, in certain circumstances, bail can be reinstated if the defendant can provide a valid reason for the violation or if the court determines that the revocation was unjust.

Yes, bail can be revoked for even minor violations if the court believes that the defendant poses a risk to public safety or is likely to flee.

Yes, if the defendant is arrested for a new offence while on bail, the court may revoke the bail as it indicates a disregard for the conditions of release.

Yes, violating a restraining order is a serious offence and can lead to bail revocation as it demonstrates a disregard for the court’s orders.

Failing a drug test while on bail can be grounds for bail revocation, especially if drug use was a factor in the original offence or if the court ordered the defendant to abstain from drug use as a condition of release.

Yes, leaving the state or country without permission is a violation of the conditions of release and can result in bail revocation. The court may view this as an attempt to evade prosecution.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 7th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Bail Revocation. DLS Solicitors. June 20 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Bail Revocation. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 20 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Bail Revocation. Retrieved June 20 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts