Define: Calandra Rule

The Calandra Rule is a legal principle established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Calandra. It states that evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant can still be used in a grand jury proceeding.

The Calandra Rule was established in 1974 by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The purpose of the Calandra Rule is to prevent the exclusion of evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant from being presented to a grand jury.

No, the Calandra Rule specifically applies to grand jury proceedings and does not extend to criminal trials.

No, evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant is generally excluded from being used in a criminal trial under the exclusionary rule.

Yes, there are exceptions to the Calandra Rule. For example, if the evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant violates the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights, it may be excluded from a grand jury proceeding.

Yes, like any legal principle, the Calandra Rule can be challenged or overturned through subsequent court decisions or legislative action.

The Calandra Rule can limit defendants’ rights by allowing evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant to be used against them in a grand jury proceeding, potentially leading to criminal charges.

Yes, there are alternative legal doctrines, such as the exclusionary rule, which generally exclude evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant from being used in both grand jury proceedings and criminal trials.

Yes, the Calandra Rule is applicable in all jurisdictions within the United States as it was established by the U.S. Supreme Court and applies to federal grand jury proceedings. However, individual states may have their own rules and interpretations regarding the admissibility of evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant in state grand jury proceedings.