Calumniae judicium, a legal term from ancient Rome, refers to a countersuit that a defendant can bring after winning a judgement in a lawsuit brought against them maliciously. In simpler terms, it allows someone who was wrongly sued to seek justice and hold the person who sued them accountable for their actions.
Calumniae judicium, a Latin term used in Roman law, refers to a countersuit that a defendant can initiate after prevailing in the main legal action. This countersuit is directed towards the individual who wrongfully sued the defendant with malicious intent. For instance, if John falsely accuses Jane of stealing his car and the court finds Jane innocent, she has the right to file a calumniae judicium against John for his malicious lawsuit. This example demonstrates the functioning of calumniae judicium, wherein a person who is wrongfully sued can seek justice by filing a countersuit against the malicious plaintiff. The purpose of this countersuit is to provide compensation to the defendant for the harm caused by the baseless lawsuit.
Calumniae Judicium is a Latin term that translates to “judgment of calumny” and refers to a legal action for defamation or slander.
Calumny refers to making false and malicious statements about someone with the intent to harm their reputation.
To prove calumny, the plaintiff must show that the defendant made a false statement about them, that the statement was made with malice or reckless disregard for the truth, and that the statement caused harm to the plaintiff’s reputation.
Calumny is a specific type of defamation that involves making false and malicious statements about someone with the intent to harm their reputation.
In a calumny case, the plaintiff can seek damages for harm to their reputation, emotional distress, and any financial losses caused by the false statements.
Yes, public figures can bring calumny cases, but they must also prove that the false statements were made with actual malice, meaning the defendant knew the statements were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
Yes, calumny cases can be brought for false and malicious statements made online, including on social media platforms.
Defenses to a calumny case may include truth, privilege, and lack of malice or reckless disregard for the truth.
The statute of limitations for filing a calumny case varies by jurisdiction, but it is typically within one to three years from the date the false statements were made.
Yes, calumny cases can be settled out of court through negotiation or mediation, but the terms of the settlement must be agreed upon by both parties.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 25th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/calumniae-judicium/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Calumniae Judicium. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/calumniae-judicium/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Calumniae Judicium. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/calumniae-judicium/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Calumniae Judicium. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/calumniae-judicium/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts