The Carroll doctrine, established in the 1958 court case Carroll Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, states that individuals who already possess a licence to broadcast on radio or TV have the right to voice their concerns if the government grants another licence to a competitor that may negatively impact their business. This rule aims to protect the financial interests and ability to provide quality services of the initial licence holder.
The Carroll Doctrine, established in 1958 in the case of Carroll Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, allows a broadcast licencee to contest the FCC’s decision to grant a competitive licence. This is based on the potential economic harm that the grant of a new licence could cause to the existing licencee’s business. For example, if a radio station has been operating in a certain area for many years, the FCC granting a new licence to another station in the same area could result in a decrease in the original station’s listenership and revenue. In such a case, the original station could use the Carroll Doctrine to challenge the FCC’s decision. The doctrine was established to give existing licencees standing to contest the grant of a competitive licence if it could lead to a reduction in broadcast service.
The Carroll Doctrine is a legal principle established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Carroll v. United States (1925). It allows law enforcement officers to conduct warrantless searches of vehicles if they have probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime.
The rationale behind the Carroll Doctrine is that vehicles have a higher mobility compared to buildings, making it easier for evidence to be quickly moved or destroyed. Therefore, the doctrine allows law enforcement officers to conduct searches without a warrant to prevent the loss of evidence.
Yes, the Carroll Doctrine applies to all types of vehicles, including cars, trucks, motorcycles, boats, and airplanes. As long as there is probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime, law enforcement officers can conduct a warrantless search.
Law enforcement officers can search the entire vehicle under the Carroll Doctrine if they have probable cause to believe that the contraband or evidence of a crime is located anywhere within the vehicle. However, the search must still be reasonable in scope and cannot be conducted as a general exploratory search.
The Carroll Doctrine primarily allows law enforcement officers to search the vehicle itself without a warrant. However, if during the search of the vehicle, officers discover contraband or evidence on the passengers or their belongings within the vehicle, they may also conduct a search of those individuals or their possessions.
Yes, the Carroll Doctrine can be used to search a vehicle parked on private property if there is probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime. However, the search must still be reasonable and not violate any other constitutional rights.
No, the Carroll Doctrine requires law enforcement officers to have probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime. Without probable cause, a warrant would generally be required to search a vehicle.
Yes, evidence obtained through a search conducted under the Carroll Doctrine can generally be used in court, as long as the search was conducted in accordance with the principles established by the Supreme Court. However, if the search violated any constitutional rights, the evidence may be suppressed.
No, the Carroll Doctrine cannot be used to justify a search based solely on the driver’s race or ethnicity. Such searches would be considered racial profiling and would violate the driver’s Fourth Amendment rights.
No, the Carroll Doctrine is a federal legal principle established by the U.S. Supreme Court and applies nationwide. State laws or regulations cannot override the principles established by the Carroll Doctrine, but they can provide additional protections or restrictions on vehicle searches within their respective jurisdictions.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/carroll-doctrine/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Carroll Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/carroll-doctrine/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Carroll Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/carroll-doctrine/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Carroll Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/carroll-doctrine/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts