When a court renders a decision, it can serve as a precedent for future cases. This is referred to as a citable precedent. A citable precedent indicates that it can be used as a basis for future cases. Published opinions are typically considered citable, whereas unpublished ones are not. Please note that “citable” can also be spelled as “citeable.” Contrast with: noncitable.
The term “citable” refers to a legal document that has been authorized by a court to serve as a legal precedent. Typically, published opinions are considered citable, while unpublished ones are not. Conversely, “noncitable” denotes a document that cannot be used as legal precedent. The landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, decided by the Supreme Court, is an example of a citable case that has been relied upon as legal precedent in numerous other cases. In contrast, a trial court’s ruling in an unpublished case is noncitable and cannot be used as legal precedent. These examples highlight the distinction between citable and noncitable legal documents. Citable documents carry weight and can be used to bolster legal arguments in future cases, while noncitable documents lack legal authority and cannot be used as precedent.
A citable legal case is one that has been officially published and can be referenced in future legal cases as a precedent.
You can check if a legal case is citable by looking for its official publication in a legal reporter or online legal database.
No, unpublished legal cases cannot be cited as precedent in legal briefs or arguments.
A citable legal case has been officially published and can be used as precedent in future legal cases, while a non-citable case has not been published and cannot be used as precedent.
Yes, foreign legal cases can be cited in U.S. courts, but their persuasive value may be limited.
Legal cases should be cited using a specific format, such as the Bluebook citation style, which includes the case name, volume and page number of the legal reporter, and the court and year of the decision.
Yes, you can cite a legal case that has been overruled or reversed, but you must also acknowledge the subsequent decision that overruled or reversed it.
Citable legal cases are important in legal research because they provide guidance and precedent for future legal cases and can help establish legal principles and rules.
Yes, you can cite a legal case that has been vacated or remanded, but you must also acknowledge the subsequent decision that vacated or remanded it.
You can search for citable legal cases on a specific legal issue using legal research databases, such as LexisNexis or Westlaw, or by consulting legal treatises and law review articles.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/citable/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Citable. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/citable/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Citable. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/citable/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Citable. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/citable/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts