Define: Citeable

In legal terms, a source is considered “citeable” if it meets the criteria for being used as a reference in legal arguments or court proceedings. This typically includes sources that are authoritative, reliable, and relevant to the legal issue at hand.

While it is generally not recommended to cite blog posts or social media posts as legal sources, there may be exceptions. If the blog post or social media post is authored by a legal expert or a reputable organisation and provides relevant and reliable information, it may be considered citeable. However, it is always best to consult with a legal professional to determine the appropriateness of such sources.

Yes, court opinions are typically considered highly citeable sources in legal proceedings. They are authoritative statements of the law and can be relied upon as legal precedent. However, it is important to ensure that the court opinion is relevant to the specific legal issue being addressed.

Yes, law review articles are often considered citeable sources in legal arguments. These articles are typically written by legal scholars and experts, providing in-depth analysis and interpretation of legal issues. However, it is important to ensure that the law review article is from a reputable publication and relevant to the specific legal matter.

Legal dictionaries and encyclopedias can be useful for providing definitions and explanations of legal terms. However, they are generally not considered primary sources and may not carry as much weight as other citeable sources. It is advisable to use them as supplementary sources rather than relying solely on them.

Yes, statutes and regulations are primary sources of law and are highly citeable in legal arguments. They are authoritative statements of the law enacted by legislative bodies or administrative agencies. However, it is important to ensure that the statute or regulation is relevant to the legal issue at hand.

Legal treatises, which are comprehensive scholarly works on specific areas of law, are often considered highly citeable sources. They provide in-depth analysis and interpretation of legal principles and can be relied upon to support legal arguments. However, it is important to ensure that the legal treatise is from a reputable author and relevant to the specific legal matter.

While news articles can provide background information and context, they are generally not considered highly citeable sources in legal arguments. News articles may lack the necessary depth and analysis required for legal proceedings. It is advisable to use news articles as supplementary sources and to rely on more authoritative legal sources whenever possible.

Citing a legal opinion from another jurisdiction can be done, but its persuasive value may vary depending on the circumstances. Courts may consider foreign legal opinions as persuasive authority, especially if they provide relevant and well-reasoned analysis. However, it is important to consult with a legal professional to determine the appropriateness and potential impact of citing foreign legal opinions.

Personal experiences or anecdotes are generally not considered citeable sources in legal cases. Legal arguments typically require objective and verifiable evidence, such as statutes, regulations, court opinions, or expert testimony. Personal experiences may be more appropriate for providing context or supporting arguments indirectly, but they are unlikely to carry significant weight as direct evidence.