The common-employment doctrine, also referred to as the fellow-servant rule, states that an employer is not accountable for an employee’s injuries resulting from a coworker’s negligence. However, workers’ compensation laws have modified this doctrine in most jurisdictions. In certain situations, an employer may still be held responsible if the coworker who caused the injury had authority or influence over the injured employee. This is known as the superior servant rule or the doctrine of vice principal.
The fellow-servant rule, also known as the common-employment doctrine, is a legal principle that absolves an employer of responsibility for injuries caused by a negligent coworker to another employee. If an employee is injured due to the negligence of a fellow employee, the employer cannot be sued for damages under this doctrine. However, workers’ compensation laws have largely replaced this doctrine by providing benefits to employees who are injured on the job, regardless of fault. In certain cases, the common-employment doctrine may still apply if the injured employee and the negligent coworker were working towards the same goal or result. However, the employer may be held liable if the negligent coworker had power or control over the injured employee. Overall, the common-employment doctrine limits an employer’s liability for injuries caused by a coworker’s negligence.
The Common-Employment Doctrine is a legal principle that holds an employer responsible for the actions of their employees while they are acting within the scope of their employment.
Under the Common-Employment Doctrine, if an employee causes harm to another person while performing their job duties, the employer can be held liable for the employee’s actions.
Yes, if an employee intentionally causes harm to another person while acting within the scope of their employment, the employer can still be held liable under the Common-Employment Doctrine.
Factors such as the nature of the employee’s job, the time and place of the incident, and whether the employee’s actions were in furtherance of their employer’s business interests are considered when determining if an employee was acting within the scope of their employment.
In some cases, an employer may be able to avoid liability if it can be proven that the employee was acting outside the scope of their employment and not in furtherance of the employer’s business interests.
Under certain circumstances, an employer can still be held liable for an employee’s actions outside of work hours if it can be shown that the employee’s actions were related to their job or if the employer had knowledge of the employee’s behavior and failed to take appropriate action.
Yes, an employer can still be held liable for an employee’s actions even if they were not aware of the employee’s misconduct, as long as the employee was acting within the scope of their employment.
No, the Common-Employment Doctrine typically does not apply to independent contractors. However, there may be other legal principles that could hold an employer liable for an independent contractor’s actions.
Yes, an employer can be held liable for an employee’s negligent actions if it can be shown that the employee was acting within the scope of their employment and their negligence caused harm to another person.
If an employee acts in self-defence while performing their job duties and causes harm to another person, the employer may still be held liable under the Common-Employment Doctrine if it can be shown that the employee’s actions were excessive or unreasonable in the circumstances.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/common-employment-doctrine/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Common-Employment Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/common-employment-doctrine/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Common-Employment Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/common-employment-doctrine/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Common-Employment Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/common-employment-doctrine/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts