Define: Comstockery

Comstockery
Comstockery
Quick Summary of Comstockery

Censorship, also known as Comstockery, occurs when individuals attempt to prevent others from accessing or perceiving materials they deem inappropriate or offensive. This may involve concealing books or artworks that they disapprove of due to their perceived immorality. However, it is important to note that censorship is not always just or ethical.

Full Definition Of Comstockery

Comstockery is the act of censoring or attempting to censor art or literature that is deemed immoral or obscene. Anthony Comstock, a prominent figure in the late 1800s, advocated for the suppression of materials he found objectionable and successfully pushed for the Comstock Act, which made it illegal to send any “obscene, lewd, or lascivious” materials through the mail. The term “comstockery” is derived from his name and actions. This type of censorship is often associated with conservative or puritanical values and is viewed as a violation of free speech and artistic expression, as illustrated by Comstock’s efforts to censor materials he deemed immoral or obscene.

Comstockery FAQ'S

Comstockery refers to the strict censorship and moralistic views advocated by Anthony Comstock, a 19th-century American social reformer. He was known for his efforts to suppress obscenity and regulate morality through legislation.

While the specific laws and regulations advocated by Anthony Comstock may not be in effect today, the concept of moral censorship and regulation of obscenity is still debated in various contexts. However, modern legal frameworks prioritize individual rights and freedom of expression over moralistic censorship.

Anthony Comstock successfully lobbied for the passage of several laws, including the Comstock Act of 1873, which criminalized the distribution of obscene materials through the mail. He also played a significant role in the passage of the Federal Obscenity Act of 1873 and the subsequent Comstock Laws.

No, the Comstock Laws were largely repealed or declared unconstitutional over time. The last remaining provision, which prohibited the mailing of contraceptive devices and information, was struck down by the Supreme Court in 1971.

The Comstock Laws were criticized for their infringement on freedom of speech and expression. They allowed for the suppression of materials deemed obscene or immoral, often leading to the censorship of artistic, literary, and scientific works.

Yes, several individuals and organisations challenged the Comstock Laws in court, arguing that they violated the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and expression. Over time, these legal challenges contributed to the erosion of the Comstock Laws.

The current legal standard for obscenity is based on the Miller test, established by the Supreme Court in the 1973 case Miller v. California. This test considers whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find the material appeals to prurient interests, depicts sexual conduct in an offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

Yes, individuals can still be prosecuted for obscenity if their materials meet the legal definition established by the Miller test and are deemed obscene within the specific jurisdiction. However, the enforcement of obscenity laws varies across different jurisdictions.

The internet has presented new challenges for obscenity laws, as it allows for the widespread distribution of explicit materials. Courts have struggled to define the boundaries of obscenity in the digital age, often considering factors such as accessibility, intent, and the age of the audience.

The concept of Comstockery serves as a historical reference point in current debates on censorship, particularly regarding the balance between protecting public morality and upholding individual rights. It highlights the tension between societal norms and the freedom of expression in a democratic society.

Related Phrases
No related content found.
Disclaimer

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/comstockery/
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Comstockery. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/comstockery/.
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Comstockery. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/comstockery/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Comstockery. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/comstockery/
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Divorce Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts