The concurrent-sentence doctrine states that if a person is convicted of multiple crimes and receives sentences for each, an appellate court is not required to review a challenge to a conviction on another count if the sentence for that count is the same or less than the sentence for the affirmed conviction. In simpler terms, if someone is found guilty of multiple crimes and the sentences are similar, the court does not need to review each individual conviction.
The concurrent-sentence doctrine is a legal principle that allows an appellate court to skip hearing a challenge to a conviction on another count if the sentence for that count is equal to or less than the affirmed conviction. For instance, if a defendant is found guilty of two crimes and given a five-year sentence for each, but the appellate court only reviews and upholds the conviction and sentence for one of the crimes, the defendant will still serve five years in prison because the sentences are concurrent. This doctrine aims to streamline the appeals process, avoid unnecessary litigation, and ensure that defendants do not face multiple punishments for the same offence.
The Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine is a legal principle that allows a judge to impose multiple sentences for multiple crimes, but to have them served at the same time.
The Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine is typically used when a defendant is convicted of multiple crimes arising from the same incident or course of conduct.
The purpose of the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine is to avoid imposing excessive punishment on a defendant by requiring them to serve multiple sentences consecutively.
Yes, a defendant can receive concurrent sentences for all of their crimes if the judge determines that it is appropriate.
Yes, a defendant can request concurrent sentences, but it is ultimately up to the judge to decide whether to impose them.
Yes, a defendant can receive concurrent sentences if they are convicted of crimes in different jurisdictions, but it may require coordination between the different courts.
Yes, a defendant can receive concurrent sentences if they are convicted of both state and federal crimes, but it may require coordination between the different courts.
Yes, a defendant can receive concurrent sentences if they are convicted of both felonies and misdemeanors.
Yes, a defendant can receive concurrent sentences if they are convicted of both violent and non-violent crimes.
Yes, a defendant can receive concurrent sentences if they have a prior criminal record, but the judge may take their prior record into account when deciding whether to impose concurrent or consecutive sentences.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/concurrent-sentence-doctrine/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/concurrent-sentence-doctrine/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/concurrent-sentence-doctrine/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/concurrent-sentence-doctrine/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts