Confession and avoidance is a legal doctrine that allows a defendant to admit to the allegations made against them while presenting additional facts or arguments to justify or excuse their actions. Essentially, the defendant acknowledges certain aspects of the plaintiff’s claim but seeks to avoid liability by offering mitigating circumstances, affirmative defences, or counterclaims. This strategy is commonly used in civil litigation and can help defendants minimise their liability or shift the blame to other parties.
n. when a defendant admits the allegations in a complaint against him/her in a lawsuit or accusations in a criminal case but alleges other facts (affirmative defences) to show that the original allegations do not prove a case against him/her. Often this means the defendant confesses to the accuracy of the stated facts and tries to avoid their legal impact.
Confession and avoidance is a legal doctrine that allows a defendant to admit to the truth of the plaintiff’s allegations while also asserting additional facts that, if proven, would defeat the plaintiff’s claim. This doctrine allows the defendant to both confess to the plaintiff’s allegations and provide a legal defence in the same pleading.
Confession and avoidance is a legal defence strategy where a defendant admits to certain allegations made against them but provides additional facts or arguments to justify or excuse their actions.
While a complete denial of allegations means the defendant is refuting all claims made against them, confession and avoidance involves admitting to some or all of the allegations but providing a legal justification or excuse for their actions.
Some examples of confession and avoidance defences include self-defence, necessity, duress, mistake of fact, and consent.
Yes, confession and avoidance can be used as a defence strategy in both criminal and civil cases, depending on the circumstances and applicable laws.
The success of a confession and avoidance defence strategy depends on various factors, including the strength of the evidence, the credibility of the defendant’s arguments, and the interpretation of the law by the judge or jury.
In some cases, a defendant may still be able to use confession and avoidance even after making a full confession. However, the effectiveness of this defence strategy may be diminished if the initial confession is considered credible and reliable.
If a confession and avoidance defence is successful, it may result in reduced charges or penalties. The court may consider the defendant’s justification or excuse and adjust the outcome accordingly.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 6th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/confession-and-avoidance/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Confession And Avoidance. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/confession-and-avoidance/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Confession And Avoidance. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/confession-and-avoidance/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Confession And Avoidance. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/confession-and-avoidance/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts