Conjectural choice rule states that in a legal case, if there is insufficient evidence to support a claim, it cannot be used as a basis for recovery. Conjecture refers to guessing or supposing, and if all theories of causation rely solely on conjecture, there is no valid foundation for seeking compensation. In other words, without concrete proof, the evidence cannot be admissible in court.
The principle states that recovery cannot be justified if all theories of causation are based solely on guesswork or supposition. For instance, in a criminal trial, the prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime. If the prosecution’s case relies only on conjecture or speculation, the principle of conjectural choice would prevent the defendant from being convicted. This principle is crucial as it guarantees that legal judgements are grounded in substantial evidence rather than mere guesswork. It safeguards individuals from being falsely accused or convicted based on weak or unreliable evidence.
The Rule of Conjectural Choice is a legal principle that allows a court to make a decision based on the most likely scenario, even if there is no direct evidence to support it.
The Rule of Conjectural Choice is used when there is insufficient evidence to make a definitive decision, but the court believes that one outcome is more likely than another.
The Rule of Conjectural Choice can be used to fill in gaps in evidence and help a court make a decision when there is not enough evidence to prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Yes, the Rule of Conjectural Choice can be used in criminal cases when there is not enough evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Yes, the Rule of Conjectural Choice can be used in civil cases when there is not enough evidence to prove liability or damages.
Yes, the Rule of Conjectural Choice can be challenged in court if there is evidence to support a different outcome.
The Rule of Conjectural Choice is based on the most likely scenario, while speculation is based on guesswork or conjecture without any evidence to support it.
Yes, the Rule of Conjectural Choice can be used to convict someone of a crime if the court believes that the most likely scenario is that the defendant is guilty.
Yes, the Rule of Conjectural Choice can be used to award damages in a civil case if the court believes that the most likely scenario is that the defendant is liable for the damages.
No, the Rule of Conjectural Choice is not used in all legal systems, and its use may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of case.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/conjectural-choice-rule-of/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Conjectural Choice, Rule Of. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/conjectural-choice-rule-of/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Conjectural Choice, Rule Of. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/conjectural-choice-rule-of/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Conjectural Choice, Rule Of. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/conjectural-choice-rule-of/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts