Contradictory Judgement

Contradictory Judgement
Contradictory Judgement
Quick Summary of Contradictory Judgement

A contradictory judgement occurs when two judgements are provided that contradict each other, causing confusion and difficulty in determining which judgement to adhere to.

Full Definition Of Contradictory Judgement

A contradictory judgement is a legal term used to describe a situation where multiple judgements in a case contradict each other. This can occur when different judges or courts provide conflicting rulings on the same matter or when a judge’s ruling contradicts their own previous decision. For instance, in a divorce case, one judge may grant custody of the children to the husband while another judge may grant custody to the wife. This results in a contradictory judgement as both rulings cannot be simultaneously followed. On the other hand, a contradictory motion refers to a motion filed by one party in a case that contradicts a previous motion filed by the same party. This can happen when a party changes their stance on an issue or presents new evidence that contradicts their previous argument. For example, in a personal injury case, the plaintiff may initially file a motion claiming that the defendant is responsible for their injuries. However, later on, the plaintiff may file a contradictory motion asserting that they themselves are responsible for their injuries. This creates a contradictory motion as both motions cannot be true at the same time. These examples demonstrate how contradictory judgements and motions can lead to confusion and uncertainty in legal proceedings. Therefore, it is crucial for judges and parties involved to carefully evaluate their arguments and evidence to avoid contradictory rulings and motions.

Contradictory Judgement FAQ'S

A contradictory judgment refers to a situation where two or more courts issue conflicting decisions on the same legal matter.

Yes, contradictory judgments can occur within the same jurisdiction if different courts or judges interpret the law differently or have varying perspectives on the facts of the case.

Contradictory judgments can create confusion and uncertainty in the legal system, as it becomes difficult to determine which decision should be followed. This can lead to inconsistent application of the law and undermine the principle of legal certainty.

Yes, contradictory judgments can be appealed to a higher court. The appellate court will review the conflicting decisions and determine which one should be upheld.

Contradictory judgments can be resolved through the appellate process, where a higher court can provide a definitive ruling on the matter. Additionally, the legal system may establish mechanisms, such as the doctrine of stare decisis, to ensure consistency in the interpretation and application of the law.

Contradictory judgments generally cannot be used as legal precedent, as they create uncertainty and lack consistency. Courts typically rely on consistent and authoritative decisions to establish legal precedent.

Contradictory judgments can be used as a defence in a legal case to argue that the law is unclear or that there is a lack of consensus among courts. However, it is ultimately up to the court to determine the weight and relevance of contradictory judgments in a particular case.

Contradictory judgments alone may not be considered a violation of due process, as the legal system allows for different interpretations and perspectives. However, if contradictory judgments result from procedural irregularities or bias, they may raise concerns about the fairness of the legal process.

Yes, contradictory judgments can be resolved through alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation or arbitration. These processes provide parties with an opportunity to reach a mutually acceptable resolution outside of the court system.

To minimize the occurrence of contradictory judgments, courts can strive for consistency in their decision-making processes, promote judicial education and training, and encourage dialogue and collaboration among judges. Additionally, legislative reforms and clearer legal guidelines can help reduce ambiguity and promote uniformity in the interpretation of the law.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 6th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Contradictory Judgement. DLS Solicitors. June 23 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Contradictory Judgement. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 23 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Contradictory Judgement. Retrieved June 23 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts