“Contrary to the evidence” refers to an argument or finding that contradicts the evidence presented in a hearing. It is akin to claiming the sky is green when it is clearly blue.
When an argument or finding contradicts the evidence presented in a hearing or trial, it is considered contrary to the facts. For instance, during a trial, a witness may testify that they saw the defendant at the scene of the crime, but the defendant’s lawyer may argue that their client was out of town at the time. This argument goes against the evidence presented by the witness. Similarly, in a scientific study, researchers may find that a certain medication is effective in treating a particular illness, but a pharmaceutical company may dispute these findings and claim that their own research shows the medication is not effective. This claim contradicts the evidence presented in the original study. These examples demonstrate how an argument or finding can be deemed contrary to the evidence when it conflicts with what has been presented and proven in a hearing or study.
“Contrary to the evidence” means that a decision or conclusion is not supported by the available evidence in a legal case.
Yes, if a judge’s decision is not supported by the evidence presented in a case, it may be considered “contrary to the evidence.”
You may have the option to appeal the decision to a higher court if you believe it is contrary to the evidence presented.
You would need to present evidence and arguments to demonstrate that the decision does not align with the evidence presented in the case.
Yes, if a jury’s verdict is not supported by the evidence presented in a case, it may be considered “contrary to the evidence.”
The consequences may vary depending on the specific case, but it could result in the decision being overturned or a new trial being ordered.
It is not extremely common, but it does happen in some legal cases where the decision does not align with the evidence presented.
Yes, a lawyer can assist you in evaluating the evidence and determining if there are grounds to challenge a decision as being contrary to the evidence.
Factors may include the strength of the evidence presented, the reasoning behind the decision, and whether there were any errors in the legal process.
The process for challenging a decision as contrary to the evidence may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. It often involves filing an appeal with a higher court.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/contrary-to-the-evidence/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Contrary To The Evidence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/contrary-to-the-evidence/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Contrary To The Evidence. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/contrary-to-the-evidence/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Contrary To The Evidence. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/contrary-to-the-evidence/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts