Define: Court Of Error

The Court of Error is a legal term used to refer to an appellate court that has the authority to review and correct errors made by lower courts.

The Court of Error is specifically focused on identifying and rectifying errors made by lower courts, whereas other appellate courts generally review the entire case for legal errors or issues.

The Court of Error can review errors of law, such as incorrect interpretation or application of statutes, procedural errors, or errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence.

No, the Court of Error generally does not have the authority to review errors of fact. Its jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors of law.

To initiate an appeal to the Court of Error, a party must file a notice of appeal within the specified time frame, usually within a certain number of days after the lower court’s decision is rendered.

The standard of review in the Court of Error is typically de novo, meaning that the court reviews the case as if it were being heard for the first time, without giving deference to the lower court’s decision.

Yes, there are usually specific requirements and limitations on appealing to the Court of Error, such as filing deadlines, jurisdictional requirements, and exhaustion of other available remedies.

No, the Court of Error’s primary function is to correct legal errors made by lower courts. It does not typically have the authority to award damages or other remedies.

In some jurisdictions, the decision of the Court of Error may be final and binding, while in others, further appeals may be available to higher appellate courts or the Supreme Court. The finality of the Court of Error’s decision depends on the specific legal system and jurisdiction.