Dediticii, a group of individuals in ancient Rome, were regarded as the lowest class of freemen. They were excluded from Roman citizenship and consisted of both enemies who surrendered to the Romans and manumitted slaves who were convicted of a crime or punished by their former owners. Although not considered slaves, they were prohibited from making a will, inheriting property, or elevating their social standing. Additionally, they were required to reside at least 100 miles away from Rome. Justinian later abolished this status.
Dediticii, also known as dediticius, were the lowest class of freemen in Roman law who were not eligible for Roman citizenship. This group included enemies who surrendered and were granted freedom, as well as manumitted slaves who had been convicted of a crime in court, branded, or put in chains by their former owners. Former slaves who were dediticii were prohibited from living within 100 miles of Rome. Justinian later abolished this status. For example, a man named Marcus was a slave who was branded by his owner for stealing. Although he was later granted freedom, he was still considered a dediticius and was unable to become a Roman citizen or live within 100 miles of Rome. This example demonstrates how a man who was once a slave and then granted freedom could still be considered a dediticius and did not have the same rights as a Roman citizen. Despite no longer being a slave, Marcus was still restricted from living near Rome and improving his status.
A dediticius was a person in ancient Roman law who had committed a crime against the state, such as treason or desertion.
The consequences of being declared a dediticius included loss of citizenship, confiscation of property, and sometimes even death.
Yes, a person could be declared a dediticius without a trial if they were caught committing a crime against the state.
It was possible for a person to regain their citizenship after being declared a dediticius, but it was a difficult and lengthy process.
There were some exceptions to the punishment for being a dediticius, such as if the person was coerced into committing the crime or if they were a minor.
Yes, the punishment for being a dediticius varied depending on the severity of the crime committed.
No, there were no legal protections for dediticii.
No, being a dediticius was not a common occurrence in ancient Rome.
Yes, being a dediticius could have an impact on a person’s family, as their property could be confiscated and their family could be ostracized.
No, the concept of dediticii is not relevant in modern law.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/dediticii/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Dediticii. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/dediticii/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Dediticii. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/dediticii/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Dediticii. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/dediticii/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts