The legal principle known as the Doctrine of Adverse Domination states that the statute of limitations for a breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim against officers and directors of a corporation is halted if the alleged wrongdoers are in control of the corporation. This means that the deadline for filing a claim is extended until a majority of the unbiased directors become aware of or are informed about the claim against the wrongdoers. The purpose of this doctrine is to prevent a director or officer from effectively concealing wrongful or fraudulent behaviour during the limitations period. It is important to note that this doctrine is only applicable for the benefit of the corporation.
The Doctrine of Adverse Domination is a principle of equity that suspends the time limit for filing a breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim against officers and directors, particularly when a corporation sues its own officers and directors. This principle is invoked when the corporate plaintiff is under the control of the alleged wrongdoers. The statute of limitations is paused until a majority of the impartial directors become aware of or are informed about the claim against the wrongdoers. The purpose of this doctrine is to prevent a director or officer from successfully concealing wrongful or fraudulent behaviour during the time limit. For instance, if a corporation’s CEO and board of directors engage in fraudulent activities that harm the corporation, the Doctrine of Adverse Domination can be utilised to suspend the statute of limitations until a majority of the impartial directors become aware of or are informed about the misconduct. This enables the corporation to pursue a claim against the wrongdoers even if the time limit has expired. It is important to emphasize that this doctrine only benefits the corporation and not the individual officers or directors.
The Doctrine of Adverse Domination is a legal principle that allows a corporation to toll the statute of limitations for claims against its directors and officers if those individuals were in control of the corporation and engaged in wrongful conduct.
The Doctrine of Adverse Domination allows a corporation to extend the statute of limitations for claims against its directors and officers if those individuals were in control of the corporation and engaged in wrongful conduct that harmed the corporation.
The purpose of the Doctrine of Adverse Domination is to protect the interests of the corporation and its shareholders by allowing claims against directors and officers to be brought even if the statute of limitations has expired.
To invoke the Doctrine of Adverse Domination, a corporation must demonstrate that its directors and officers engaged in wrongful conduct that harmed the corporation, and that those individuals were in control of the corporation during the time period in question.
Yes, the Doctrine of Adverse Domination can be used in cases of fraud or embezzlement if the directors and officers of the corporation were in control and engaged in the wrongful conduct.
The application of the Doctrine of Adverse Domination may be limited by state law and the specific circumstances of the case. It is important to consult with a legal professional to determine the applicability of the doctrine in a particular situation.
Yes, the Doctrine of Adverse Domination can be used in cases of negligence or breach of fiduciary duty if the directors and officers of the corporation were in control and engaged in the wrongful conduct.
The Doctrine of Adverse Domination can extend the statute of limitations for claims against directors and officers, potentially increasing their liability for wrongful conduct that harmed the corporation.
The Doctrine of Adverse Domination is closely related to corporate governance, as it addresses the accountability of directors and officers for their actions while in control of the corporation.
A corporation should consult with legal counsel to determine if it can invoke the Doctrine of Adverse Domination based on the specific circumstances of the case and applicable state law.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/doctrine-of-adverse-domination/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Doctrine Of Adverse Domination. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/doctrine-of-adverse-domination/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Doctrine Of Adverse Domination. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/doctrine-of-adverse-domination/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Doctrine Of Adverse Domination. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/doctrine-of-adverse-domination/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts