En banc sitting refers to a court session in which all judges, or a majority of them, participate. This type of sitting occurs in appellate courts, which review decisions made by lower courts. Another type of sitting is in camera, where a judge conducts a court session in their private chambers or outside the courtroom.
An en banc sitting refers to a court session where all judges or a minimum number of judges participate. For instance, the Supreme Court of the United States may convene an en banc sitting to review a case of significant importance or controversy. During an en banc sitting, all judges or a quorum come together to hear a case. This is typically done for cases that hold great significance or are highly controversial, as it allows for a wider range of perspectives and opinions to be considered in the decision-making process. Another type of court session is a sitting, which refers to a session of an appellate court. Additionally, an in camera sitting is a court session conducted by a judge in chambers or outside the courtroom. For example, a judge may hold an in camera sitting to hear sensitive or confidential information that cannot be disclosed in open court. During an in camera sitting, a judge hears a case or evidence privately to protect sensitive or confidential information, such as matters related to national security or personal privacy.
An en banc sitting is a hearing or decision-making session in which all judges of a court participate, rather than just a panel of judges.
An en banc sitting is typically used for cases that are particularly complex or controversial, or cases that involve important legal issues.
The number of judges who participate in an en banc sitting can vary depending on the court, but it is usually all of the judges on the court.
An en banc sitting is different from a regular hearing or decision-making session because it involves all of the judges on the court, rather than just a panel of judges.
Parties can request an en banc sitting, but the decision to hold one is ultimately up to the court.
The purpose of an en banc sitting is to ensure that important legal issues are decided by the full court, rather than just a panel of judges.
An en banc decision is made by a majority vote of the judges who participate in the sitting.
An en banc decision can be appealed, just like any other decision made by a court.
The length of an en banc sitting can vary depending on the complexity of the case and the number of judges who participate, but it is usually longer than a regular hearing or decision-making session.
En banc sittings are relatively rare, and are typically reserved for cases that are particularly complex or controversial, or cases that involve important legal issues.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/en-banc-sitting/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):En Banc Sitting. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/en-banc-sitting/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):En Banc Sitting. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/en-banc-sitting/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):En Banc Sitting. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/en-banc-sitting/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts