Equitable rescission refers to the court’s decision to nullify a contract due to unfairness or a violation of rules. This typically occurs when both parties mutually consent to cancel the contract and revert to the pre-agreement state. It can be likened to undoing a mistake by pressing the “undo” button. In certain cases, a court of law may also have the authority to cancel a contract, depending on the terms agreed upon and the breaches committed.
Equitable rescission is the term used to describe the cancellation of a contract by a court of equity. It is a remedy that can be sought by a non-defaulting party who has a valid reason to cancel the contract, such as the other party’s significant breach or a court judgement rescinding the contract. Equitable rescission also involves the restitution of any partial performance, which means that both parties are returned to their pre-contractual positions. This remedy is typically used when the non-defaulting party wants to cancel the contract but is unable to do so according to the terms of the agreement. For instance, if a buyer purchases a car from a seller and later discovers that the car has a serious defect that the seller was aware of but did not disclose, the buyer may seek equitable rescission of the contract. The court may then cancel the contract and order the seller to refund the purchase price to the buyer. Another example is when a party enters into a contract under duress or coercion. In such cases, the party may seek equitable rescission of the contract in order to be released from the agreement. It is important to note that equitable rescission differs from legal rescission, which is a remedy that can be achieved through the agreement of the parties or ordered by a court of law. Legal rescission is generally available when the parties mutually agree to cancel the contract or when a court determines that the contract is void or unenforceable.
Equitable rescission is a legal remedy that allows a party to a contract to cancel or undo the contract due to certain circumstances, such as fraud, mistake, or misrepresentation.
Equitable rescission can be used when there is a valid reason to believe that the contract was entered into based on false information, deception, or a mistake that significantly affects the terms of the contract.
Common grounds for seeking equitable rescission include fraud, duress, undue influence, mutual mistake, unilateral mistake, or misrepresentation.
Equitable rescission can be sought in various types of contracts, including real estate contracts, business contracts, employment contracts, and consumer contracts, among others.
Equitable rescission is a remedy based on fairness and justice, while legal rescission is a remedy based on specific legal grounds, such as a breach of contract. Equitable rescission focuses on undoing the contract, while legal rescission focuses on compensating the injured party.
Equitable rescission aims to restore the parties to their pre-contractual positions, as if the contract never existed. It typically involves returning any consideration exchanged and reversing any actions taken under the contract.
Yes, a court can grant equitable rescission if it determines that the circumstances warrant it and that it is the appropriate remedy in the given situation.
The time limit for seeking equitable rescission varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional to determine the applicable time limit.
Yes, equitable rescission can be used as a defence in a lawsuit if the party seeking rescission believes that the contract should be canceled due to the grounds mentioned earlier.
If you believe you have grounds for equitable rescission, it is important to consult with a qualified attorney who specializes in contract law. They can assess your situation, advise you on the best course of action, and guide you through the legal process.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/equitable-rescission/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Equitable Rescission. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/equitable-rescission/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Equitable Rescission. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/equitable-rescission/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Equitable Rescission. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/equitable-rescission/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts