Ethical absolutism, also referred to as moral absolutism, asserts that an action is inherently right or wrong, irrespective of the context or consequences. This implies that there exist immutable moral principles that must never be transgressed. It stands in contrast to moral relativism, which posits that the determination of right or wrong can fluctuate based on the particular circumstances.
Ethical absolutism, also referred to as moral absolutism, asserts that an action is inherently right or wrong, irrespective of the situation or outcomes. It is also known as objective ethics as it maintains that moral principles are universally applicable. For instance, a common illustration of ethical absolutism is the belief that killing is always morally wrong, regardless of the circumstances. Another example is the belief that lying is always morally wrong, even if it is intended to safeguard someone from harm. These examples demonstrate how ethical absolutism upholds that certain actions possess inherent moral value, regardless of the surrounding context. It does not consider the consequences of an action or the intentions behind it. For instance, in the case of killing, ethical absolutism would maintain that it is always morally wrong, even if it is carried out in self-defence or to protect others.
Ethical absolutism is a moral theory that asserts that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of the circumstances or consequences. It suggests that there are objective moral principles that should be followed universally.
Ethical absolutism stands in contrast to ethical relativism, which argues that moral judgments are subjective and vary depending on cultural, societal, or individual perspectives. Ethical absolutism holds that there are universal moral truths that apply to all individuals, regardless of their cultural or personal beliefs.
Ethical absolutism does not typically allow for exceptions or situational considerations. It maintains that certain actions, such as murder or lying, are always wrong, regardless of the circumstances. However, some proponents of ethical absolutism may argue for limited exceptions in extreme cases, such as self-defence.
Ethical absolutism can influence legal systems by advocating for the establishment of laws that align with universally accepted moral principles. It may argue for the criminalization of actions deemed morally wrong, even if they are not universally illegal.
Yes, ethical absolutism can potentially conflict with individual rights, as it prioritizes adherence to moral principles over personal autonomy. For example, if ethical absolutism deems a certain action as morally wrong, it may advocate for restricting an individual’s right to engage in that action.
While ethical absolutism may influence legal systems to some extent, most legal systems incorporate elements of ethical relativism. They consider societal norms, cultural values, and individual rights when formulating laws, rather than solely relying on universal moral principles.
Ethical absolutism often aligns with religious beliefs that assert the existence of objective moral truths. Many religious doctrines provide a set of moral guidelines that are considered universally applicable and binding for their followers.
Ethical absolutism, if misinterpreted or misapplied, can potentially be used to justify discriminatory practices. However, proponents of ethical absolutism argue that true ethical principles are inherently inclusive and promote equality and justice for all individuals.
Ethical absolutism does not typically allow for moral progress or change, as it asserts that moral principles are fixed and unchanging. However, some proponents may argue that ethical absolutism can evolve through a deeper understanding and interpretation of universal moral truths.
Ethical absolutism can play a significant role in legal debates and decision-making by providing a moral framework for evaluating the legality and morality of certain actions. It can shape the arguments presented by legal professionals and influence the judgments made by judges and juries.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/ethical-absolutism/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Ethical Absolutism. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/ethical-absolutism/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Ethical Absolutism. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/ethical-absolutism/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Ethical Absolutism. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/ethical-absolutism/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts