The Fauntleroy doctrine, derived from the court case Fauntleroy v. Lum, stipulates that if one state renders a decision regarding an incident that occurred within its jurisdiction, another state is obligated to honour and abide by that decision, regardless of any disagreement or conflict with its own laws.
The Fauntleroy Doctrine is a legal principle that mandates a state to acknowledge and uphold a judgement made by another state, regardless of the legality of the claim in the state seeking enforcement. This principle remains applicable as long as the state that issued the judgement had proper jurisdiction over the case. For instance, if an individual is sued for breach of contract in State A and the court in State A rules in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages, the Fauntleroy Doctrine would compel State B to recognize and enforce the judgement from State A, even if the contract in question is illegal according to State B’s laws. Another scenario could involve a person obtaining a divorce in State A, but the grounds for divorce are not considered valid in State B. Nevertheless, State B would still be obligated to recognize and enforce the divorce decree under the Fauntleroy Doctrine.
The Fauntleroy Doctrine is a legal principle that prohibits the federal government from being sued without its consent.
The Fauntleroy Doctrine originated from the 1892 Supreme Court case, Fauntleroy v. Lum.
No, the Fauntleroy Doctrine only applies to the federal government and does not extend to state governments.
Yes, individuals can sue the federal government if it has waived its sovereign immunity in a particular area through legislation.
Some exceptions to the Fauntleroy Doctrine include the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Tucker Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Under the Fauntleroy Doctrine, federal agencies are generally immune from lawsuits unless Congress has specifically waived their immunity.
No, the Fauntleroy Doctrine only applies to the federal government and does not extend to state governments.
The purpose of the Fauntleroy Doctrine is to protect the federal government from being burdened with lawsuits and to preserve its sovereign immunity.
No, the Fauntleroy Doctrine generally protects federal employees from being sued in their official capacity.
There have been ongoing debates and legal challenges regarding the scope and application of the Fauntleroy Doctrine, particularly in cases involving government accountability and individual rights.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fauntleroy-doctrine/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Fauntleroy Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fauntleroy-doctrine/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Fauntleroy Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fauntleroy-doctrine/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Fauntleroy Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fauntleroy-doctrine/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts