The Feist doctrine, established in the 1991 court case Feist Pubs. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., states that simply working hard to gather information or facts does not grant someone automatic copyright ownership. Under this doctrine, if someone compiles a collection of non-original facts, they cannot claim copyright protection for it. This doctrine differs from the “sweat-of-the-brow” doctrine, which asserts that individuals who exert significant effort to create something should inherently have copyright ownership.
The Feist Doctrine is a legal principle that states that a compilation of facts without originality cannot be protected by U.S. copyright law. This means that if someone creates a list of easily obtainable facts, they cannot assert exclusive rights over that list. For instance, if someone simply copies and pastes information from other sources to create a phone book, they cannot claim copyright protection for it. This was exemplified in the Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Co. case, where the Supreme Court ruled that Rural Telephone Service Co. could not secure copyright protection for their phone book due to its lack of originality. The Feist Doctrine is significant as it encourages the unrestricted dissemination of information and fosters creativity and innovation. It ensures that copyright protection is only granted to original works that necessitate skill, creativity, and effort in their creation.
The Feist Doctrine refers to a legal principle established by the United States Supreme Court in Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co. It states that factual information, such as names, addresses, and phone numbers, cannot be copyrighted, as they lack the originality required for copyright protection.
The Feist Doctrine primarily applies to factual information, such as data, statistics, names, addresses, phone numbers, and other non-creative elements. It does not cover original works of authorship, such as literary, artistic, or musical creations.
Yes, you can use factual information from someone else’s work without permission, as long as you do not copy the creative expression or arrangement of that information. The Feist Doctrine allows for the free use of factual data.
No, you cannot copyright a compilation of factual information alone. The Feist Doctrine emphasizes that copyright protection only extends to the original creative expression involved in the compilation, not the underlying facts themselves.
Yes, you can copyright a database that contains factual information, but only if the selection, arrangement, or coordination of the factual elements demonstrates sufficient creativity. The Feist Doctrine requires a minimal level of creativity for copyright protection.
No, you cannot sue someone for using factual information from your work, as long as they have not copied the creative expression or arrangement of that information. The Feist Doctrine allows for the free use of factual data.
You can claim copyright infringement if someone copies the creative expression or arrangement of your compilation of factual information. However, you cannot claim infringement based solely on the use of the underlying facts themselves, as they are not protected by copyright.
Yes, you can use the Feist Doctrine as a defence against copyright infringement claims if you are accused of using factual information without permission. The doctrine establishes that factual information is not subject to copyright protection.
Yes, there are exceptions to the Feist Doctrine. For example, if the factual information is obtained through illegal means, such as hacking or unauthorized access, it may not be protected by the doctrine. Additionally, certain compilations of factual information may be protected if they meet the required level of creativity.
The Feist Doctrine is a legal principle established in the United States and primarily applies to copyright law within the country. Other countries may have their own laws and doctrines regarding the protection of factual information, which may differ from the Feist Doctrine.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/feist-doctrine/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Feist Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/feist-doctrine/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Feist Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/feist-doctrine/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Feist Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/feist-doctrine/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts