In Roman law, a filiusfamilias refers to a child, grandchild, son, or daughter who has not yet reached adulthood and is still under the control of their father or grandfather. They are also referred to as homo alieni juris. Every Roman citizen is classified as either a paterfamilias (an adult who is no longer under paternal authority) or a filiusfamilias (a child who is still under the control of their father or grandfather).
In Roman law, a filiusfamilias refers to an unemancipated child or grandchild who is still under the authority of their father or grandfather. Lucius and Julia serve as examples of filiusfamilias, as they are both dependent on their respective fathers. This demonstrates that a filiusfamilias is a young individual who lacks independence and has restricted legal rights, unable to make decisions autonomously.
Filiusfamilias is a Latin term that refers to the eldest male in a Roman family who holds authority over all other family members, including his wife, children, and slaves.
No, the concept of filiusfamilias is specific to Roman law and is not recognized in modern legal systems.
A filiusfamilias had complete control over the family’s property, finances, and legal matters. He also had the power to make decisions regarding marriage, divorce, and adoption within the family.
Yes, a filiusfamilias could be held legally responsible for the actions of his wife, children, and slaves. He had the authority to discipline and punish them as he saw fit.
Yes, a filiusfamilias had a legal obligation to provide for the basic needs of his family members, including food, shelter, and clothing. He was also responsible for their education and upbringing.
Yes, a filiusfamilias could be held liable for the debts incurred by his wife, children, and slaves. He was responsible for managing the family’s finances and ensuring that debts were paid.
Yes, a filiusfamilias had the power to disinherit his children if he deemed them unworthy or disobedient. However, there were certain legal procedures that needed to be followed to ensure the disinheritance was valid.
No, a filiusfamilias held absolute authority within the family and could not be legally challenged or overruled by other family members.
A filiusfamilias had the legal obligation to provide for the basic needs of his slaves, including food, shelter, and clothing. However, the treatment of slaves varied widely depending on the individual filiusfamilias.
The concept of filiusfamilias has had little direct influence on modern family law. However, it provides historical context and understanding of the evolution of family structures and legal systems.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/filiusfamilias/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Filiusfamilias. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/filiusfamilias/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Filiusfamilias. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/filiusfamilias/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Filiusfamilias. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/filiusfamilias/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts