The fraud-on-the-market principle states that if a person purchases a stock in a public market and its value is based on false information, they have the right to sue for fraud, regardless of whether they were aware of the falsity of the information. This is because the market price of the stock is considered to reflect all publicly available information. However, this principle can be contested. Fraud occurs when someone deceives or conceals crucial information in order to harm another person. It can be classified as either a criminal offence or a civil wrongdoing.
The legal principle of fraud-on-the-market enables a plaintiff to establish reliance on a misstatement regarding a security’s value, even without actual knowledge of the fraudulent statement. This is applicable when the stock is purchased in an open and developed securities market, as the market price of the issuer’s stock reflects all available public information. However, this presumption is rebuttable. For instance, if a company makes a false statement about its financial health, investors who bought the company’s stock in an open and developed securities market can sue the company for securities fraud. They can utilise the fraud-on-the-market principle to establish reliance on the false statement without proving their awareness of its falsity. The presumption is that the investors relied on the market price of the stock, which reflected the false statement. The company can challenge this presumption by demonstrating that the investors did not rely on the false statement. Essentially, the fraud-on-the-market principle is a legal mechanism that facilitates investors in seeking compensation for securities fraud by acknowledging their reliance on the market price of a stock to make investment decisions.
The Fraud-On-The-Market Principle is a legal theory that allows investors to bring a securities fraud claim without having to prove individual reliance on the alleged misrepresentation or omission. It is based on the assumption that in an efficient market, investors rely on the integrity of the market price, which incorporates all material information.
Under the Fraud-On-The-Market Principle, plaintiffs can establish reliance on a misrepresentation or omission by showing that the information was publicly available, the market was efficient, and the stock price was affected by the misrepresentation or omission. This allows investors to bring class action lawsuits on behalf of all affected shareholders.
The Fraud-On-The-Market Principle is significant because it simplifies the burden of proof for plaintiffs in securities fraud cases. It recognizes the reality of modern securities markets, where investors rely on the market price as an indicator of a stock’s value and the accuracy of the information available.
Yes, there are limitations to the Fraud-On-The-Market Principle. For example, plaintiffs must still prove that the alleged misrepresentation or omission was material and that they suffered actual damages as a result. Additionally, the market must be shown to be efficient, which can be a complex and fact-specific analysis.
The Fraud-On-The-Market Principle is primarily used in cases involving public securities traded on efficient markets. It may not apply to private securities or markets that are not considered efficient.
Yes, the Fraud-On-The-Market Principle has been recognized and endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in the landmark case Basic Inc. v. Levinson (1988). It has since been applied in numerous securities fraud cases.
The Fraud-On-The-Market Principle is primarily a concept developed in the United States. However, some other jurisdictions have adopted similar principles or have recognized the importance of market efficiency in securities fraud cases.
The Fraud-On-The-Market Principle is primarily used in civil cases to establish liability for securities fraud. It may not be directly applicable in criminal cases, which have different burdens of proof and legal standards.
The Fraud-On-The-Market Principle is specifically designed for securities fraud cases. It may not be directly applicable to other types of fraud, such as consumer fraud or insurance fraud, which have different legal principles and requirements.
The Fraud-On-The-Market Principle is primarily applicable to publicly traded companies where the market price is readily available and reflects the information available to investors. It may not be directly applicable to non-publicly traded companies, where reliance on market price may not be relevant.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fraud-on-the-market-principle/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Fraud-On-The-Market Principle. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fraud-on-the-market-principle/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Fraud-On-The-Market Principle. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fraud-on-the-market-principle/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Fraud-On-The-Market Principle. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/fraud-on-the-market-principle/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts