Define: Gratuitous Agent

Gratuitous Agent
Gratuitous Agent
Quick Summary of Gratuitous Agent

A gratuitous agent is an individual who acts on behalf of another party without expecting any compensation or payment in return. In legal terms, this person voluntarily undertakes tasks or responsibilities on behalf of someone else, without entering into a formal contract or agreement that would typically involve payment for their services. While they may not receive financial compensation, gratuitous agents still owe a duty of care and loyalty to the party they represent, and their actions are generally subject to the same legal standards and obligations as those of compensated agents.

What is the dictionary definition of Gratuitous Agent?
Dictionary Definition of Gratuitous Agent

An agent who receives no compensation for his or her services.

Full Definition Of Gratuitous Agent

In the field of agency law, the idea of a gratuitous agent holds a special place. Unlike regular agents who carry out tasks for a principal in exchange for payment, a gratuitous agent acts without expecting any compensation. This overview will examine the legal framework concerning gratuitous agents in British law, including how they are appointed, their responsibilities, rights, and liabilities.

Definition and Creation of Gratuitous Agency

A gratuitous agent is an individual who agrees to act on behalf of a principal without expecting financial compensation. The creation of a gratuitous agency relationship does not require a formal contract and can arise from a simple agreement between the parties. The principal’s consent to have the agent represent him or her, the agent’s consent to act, and the agent’s undertaking of an action within the scope of the principal’s authority are necessary components for the formation of any agency, even a gratuitous one.

Duties of a Gratuitous Agent

The duties of a gratuitous agent, although acting without compensation, are largely similar to those of a paid agent. These duties are derived from both common law principles and statutory provisions.

  • Duty of Care and Skill: A gratuitous agent must exercise a reasonable level of care and skill while performing the duties entrusted to them. While the standard of care expected may be lower than that of a professional agent, it must still be consistent with that of a reasonable person in similar circumstances.
  • Duty to Obey Instructions: The agent must follow all lawful instructions given by the principal. Failure to do so could result in liability for any losses incurred by the principal as a consequence.
  • Duty of Loyalty: The agent must act in the best interests of the principal and avoid any conflicts of interest. This includes not making any secret profits from the agency and not acting for an adverse party without the principal’s consent.
  • Duty to Account: The agent must keep accurate records of all transactions and dealings carried out on behalf of the principal and must be ready to account for them upon request.
  • Duty of Confidentiality: The agent is required to keep the principal’s information confidential and not disclose it without consent.

Rights of a Gratuitous Agent

Although a gratuitous agent does not receive financial compensation, they still possess certain rights within the agency relationship.

  • Right to Indemnity: The agent has the right to be indemnified by the principal for any expenses or losses incurred while performing their duties, provided these were within the scope of their authority and the agent acted in good faith.
  • Right to Reimbursement: Any reasonable expenses incurred by the agent in the course of performing their duties must be reimbursed by the principal.
  • Right to Retain: The agent may retain possession of the principal’s property until the principal fulfils their obligations towards the agent, such as reimbursing expenses.

Liabilities of a Gratuitous Agent

A gratuitous agent can be held liable for certain acts or omissions, despite their non-compensatory status.

  • Liability for Negligence: If the agent fails to exercise reasonable care and skill, they may be liable for any resulting losses to the principal. However, the threshold for negligence is generally lower compared to a compensated agent.
  • Liability for Breach of Duty: Breaching any of the aforementioned duties can result in the agent being held liable for damages. For instance, failure to follow the principal’s lawful instructions or to account properly can lead to liability.
  • Liability for Exceeding Authority: If the agent acts beyond the scope of their authority, they can be personally liable for any losses suffered by the principal or third parties.
  • Misrepresentation and Fraud: Should the agent engage in fraudulent activities or make false representations, they can be held liable for any consequent damages.

Termination of Gratuitous Agency

The termination of a gratuitous agency can occur in various ways, similar to other forms of agency.

  • Mutual Agreement: Both the principal and the agent can mutually agree to terminate the agency relationship at any time.
  • Revocation by Principal: The principal has the right to revoke the agency at any time, although this might lead to liability if the revocation causes harm to the agent.
  • Renunciation by Agent: The agent can renounce their position at any time, provided they give reasonable notice to the principal.
  • Completion of Task: The agency automatically terminates once the specific task or purpose for which it was created has been accomplished.
  • Death or Insanity: The death or insanity of either the principal or the agent typically results in the termination of the agency relationship.
  • Bankruptcy: The bankruptcy of the principal can also lead to the termination of the agency.

Case Law on Gratuitous Agency

British case law provides various examples illustrating the principles governing gratuitous agency. One landmark case is Chaudhry v Prabhakar [1988] 3 All ER 718, where the court held that a gratuitous agent, in this case, a friend advising on the purchase of a car, owed a duty of care and was liable for negligent misrepresentation. This case underscores that even without financial compensation, agents are expected to exercise reasonable care and skill.

Another important case is Yonge v Toynbee [1910] 1 KB 215, which involved a solicitor acting without knowing that his principal had become insane. The court held that the solicitor was not liable for actions taken in good faith before discovering the principal’s insanity. This case illustrates the complexities that can arise in determining the extent of an agent’s authority and liability.

Comparative Analysis with Paid Agency

While the core principles of agency law apply to both gratuitous and paid agents, there are distinct differences in expectations and liabilities. Paid agents are generally held to a higher standard of care and skill due to their professional status and compensation. Additionally, the expectation of loyalty and fiduciary duties might be more stringent for paid agents.

However, gratuitous agents, despite their voluntary status, are not absolved of responsibility. They are still subject to obligations of care, loyalty, and accountability, and violations are punishable by punishment. The main differentiator is the level of expectation, particularly concerning the standard of care.

Practical Considerations

From a practical standpoint, both principals and agents should clearly outline the terms of their relationship, even in the absence of formal compensation. This includes specifying the scope of the agent’s authority, duties, and any expectations regarding reimbursement of expenses. Documentation can help prevent disputes and provide clarity on the roles and responsibilities of each party.

Principals should be mindful of selecting competent individuals as gratuitous agents, given that these agents, while not financially motivated, still hold the potential to significantly impact the principal’s affairs. Conversely, agents should be aware of the responsibilities they undertake and act diligently to avoid potential liability.


The concept of a gratuitous agent underscores the flexibility and diversity within agency law. Gratuitous agents are subject to significant obligations and potential liabilities while acting without payment. Both principals and agents must navigate this relationship with a clear understanding of their rights, obligations, and legal implications. Even in non-commercial contexts, agency relationships are subject to fairness and accountability thanks to British case law’s ongoing shaping of their understanding and application.

Gratuitous Agent FAQ'S

A gratuitous agent is an individual who acts on behalf of another without expectation of compensation or remuneration, typically performing voluntary or charitable services.

The key distinction is that a gratuitous agent acts without expectation of payment, while a paid agent (such as an employee or contractor) receives compensation for their services.

Gratuitous agents owe fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of the principal, exercise reasonable care and skill, avoid conflicts of interest, and comply with instructions, unless contrary to law or public policy.

Yes, a gratuitous agent can be held liable for negligence or misconduct in performing their duties, subject to the same legal standards of care and liability as paid agents.

Gratuitous agents may be entitled to reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of their duties, although reimbursement is typically limited to actual expenses and does not include compensation for time or effort.

Yes, a gratuitous agent can typically terminate their agency relationship at any time, although they may have obligations to notify the principal and take reasonable steps to avoid harm or disruption to the principal’s interests.

If a gratuitous agent breaches their fiduciary duties, they may be liable for damages resulting from their misconduct, and the principal may have legal remedies such as suing for breach of contract or seeking injunctive relief.

Gratuitous agents generally have the authority to bind the principal to contracts or obligations if they act within the scope of their authority and the principal ratifies their actions, although there may be limitations based on the nature of the agency relationship.

While agency relationships with gratuitous agents may be informal, it is advisable to establish clear expectations, scope of authority, and instructions to avoid misunderstandings or disputes.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 8th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Gratuitous Agent. DLS Solicitors. June 16 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Gratuitous Agent. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 16 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Gratuitous Agent. Retrieved June 16 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts