The term “in casu consimili” in Latin means “in a like case”. It pertains to a legal action that permits a person with a future interest in land to file a lawsuit for the recovery of land that has been sold or transferred by a life tenant or tenant by the curtesy. This action was established by the second Statute of Westminster in 1285, which mandated the Chancery to issue a writ for any circumstance that required a writ similar to one that had previously been issued in a comparable case.
The term “in casu consimili” is a Latin phrase that means “in a like case.” It refers to a legal remedy known as a writ of entry, which enables a person with a reversionary interest in land to seek the return of land that has been transferred by a life tenant or a tenant by the curtesy. For instance, if John leases his land to Mary for her lifetime and she sells it to Tom without John’s consent, John can utilise the writ of entry in casu consimili to file a lawsuit for the return of the land. This writ originated from the second Statute of Westminster (13 Edw. I) ch. 24 in 1285. According to this statute, the Chancery was required to issue a writ whenever a situation arose that necessitated a writ similar to one that had been previously issued in a like case. This example demonstrates how the writ of entry in casu consimili can safeguard the rights of individuals with a reversionary interest in land, enabling them to take legal action to reclaim land that has been transferred without their permission.
“In casu consimili” is a Latin phrase that translates to “in a similar case.” It refers to the principle of law that allows courts to rely on previous similar cases as precedents when deciding current cases.
The principle of “in casu consimili” allows courts to ensure consistency and predictability in their decisions by considering how similar cases have been resolved in the past. It helps in establishing legal principles and guidelines for future cases.
Yes, the principle of “in casu consimili” can be applied to various legal matters, including civil, criminal, and administrative cases. It is a fundamental aspect of the common law system.
When determining if a case is similar enough to apply “in casu consimili,” courts consider various factors such as the factual circumstances, legal issues involved, and the overall context of the cases. The more similarities there are, the stronger the basis for applying the principle.
Yes, “in casu consimili” can be used to challenge and potentially overturn previous legal decisions. If a court finds that a previous decision was wrongly decided or no longer applicable due to changes in circumstances, it may choose to depart from the precedent set by that case.
While “in casu consimili” is a valuable tool in legal decision-making, it is not an absolute rule. Courts have the discretion to distinguish cases if they find significant differences in the facts or legal principles involved. Additionally, the principle may not be applicable in jurisdictions that do not follow the common law system.
Lawyers can use “in casu consimili” to strengthen their arguments by identifying and referencing previous cases with similar facts and legal issues. By demonstrating how previous courts have ruled in similar situations, lawyers can establish a persuasive precedent for their client’s position.
While “in casu consimili” is primarily associated with common law systems, similar principles exist in civil law and international law. In international law, the principle of “stare decisis” is often used to refer to the reliance on previous decisions as precedents.
“In casu consimili” is closely related to the concept of legal precedent. It is one of the ways in which legal precedents are established and followed. By considering similar cases, courts can create a consistent body of legal principles that guide future decisions.
While “in casu consimili” is primarily used in court proceedings, it can also be relevant in alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation or arbitration. Parties involved in these processes can refer to previous cases with similar facts and legal issues to support their arguments and reach a resolution.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-casu-consimili/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):In Casu Consimili. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-casu-consimili/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):In Casu Consimili. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-casu-consimili/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):In Casu Consimili. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-casu-consimili/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts