According to Roman law, if someone denies a claim for damages, it can lead to a more complex legal process and an increase in the damages. For instance, if someone denies owing money, they may be required to pay more than the initial amount claimed. This is due to the fact that the denial prolongs and complicates the legal proceedings, potentially resulting in a penalty that is twice, thrice, or four times the original claim amount.
The Latin phrase “in quibus infitiando lis crescit” in Roman law refers to the concept that a legal suit increases in magnitude when the defendant denies the claim. This principle is applied to determine the measure of damages in a legal action. If the defendant wrongfully denies a claim for damages, they may be penalized by a multiple of the original claimed amount, typically double, triple, or quadruple. For instance, if a plaintiff sues a defendant for $10,000 in damages, and the defendant denies the claim, but the court finds them at fault, they may be ordered to pay $20,000, $30,000, or $40,000 instead of just $10,000. Similarly, if a landlord unlawfully withholds a tenant’s security deposit and the tenant sues for its return, the landlord may be ordered to pay double or triple the amount of the security deposit if they deny the claim and are found at fault. These examples demonstrate how the suit increases in magnitude when the defendant denies the claim, as they risk a higher penalty if found at fault. If the defendant had not denied the claim, the damages would have been limited to the original amount claimed.
“In Quibus Infitiando Lis Crescit” is a Latin phrase that translates to “In those things which are denied, the dispute grows.” It refers to a legal principle that states that when one party denies certain facts or allegations, it can lead to an escalation of the dispute.
This principle is often invoked in legal proceedings when one party denies certain facts or allegations made by the opposing party. It signifies that by denying these facts, the dispute between the parties can intensify and become more complex.
Yes, it can be used as a defence strategy when a party denies certain allegations or facts presented by the opposing party. By denying these claims, the defending party aims to escalate the dispute and potentially weaken the opposing party’s case.
Yes, there are limitations to its application. The principle is not applicable in every legal dispute and may depend on the specific laws and regulations governing the case. Additionally, the court’s discretion plays a role in determining the relevance and impact of this principle.
By denying certain facts or allegations, a party can complicate the legal proceedings and potentially create more issues for the opposing party to address. This can impact the outcome of the case by increasing the burden of proof or creating additional legal hurdles.
The principle of “In Quibus Infitiando Lis Crescit” is derived from Roman law and is recognized in many legal systems influenced by Roman law, such as civil law jurisdictions. However, its application and significance may vary depending on the specific legal system and the court’s interpretation.
While the principle is primarily associated with civil law disputes, it can also have some relevance in criminal cases. However, its application in criminal law may be limited compared to civil law cases.
A lawyer can strategically employ this principle by denying certain allegations or facts presented by the opposing party. By doing so, they can create opportunities to challenge the opposing party’s case, introduce doubt, and potentially weaken their arguments.
Yes, there are risks involved. By denying certain facts or allegations, a party may be required to provide alternative evidence or explanations to support their position. If they fail to do so convincingly, it can weaken their overall case and potentially harm their credibility.
Yes, the principle can be relevant in alternative dispute resolution methods as well. By denying certain facts or allegations during mediation or arbitration, a party can attempt to escalate the dispute and potentially gain leverage in the negotiation process. However, the application of this principle may vary depending on the specific rules and procedures of the chosen alternative dispute resolution method.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-quibus-infitiando-lis-crescit/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):In Quibus Infitiando Lis Crescit. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-quibus-infitiando-lis-crescit/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):In Quibus Infitiando Lis Crescit. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-quibus-infitiando-lis-crescit/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):In Quibus Infitiando Lis Crescit. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/in-quibus-infitiando-lis-crescit/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts