Define: In Rigore Juris

“In Rigore Juris” is a Latin phrase that translates to “in strict law” or “according to the letter of the law.” It refers to the strict interpretation and application of legal principles without any leniency or exceptions.

When “In Rigore Juris” is applied, the court strictly adheres to the letter of the law, without considering any extenuating circumstances or personal biases. This can result in a more rigid and inflexible approach to legal proceedings.

While “In Rigore Juris” can be used to argue for a strict interpretation of the law, it is not typically used as a standalone defence in criminal cases. Other legal defences, such as self-defence or lack of intent, are more commonly employed.

In certain cases, the court may deviate from the strict application of the law if it would lead to an unjust or absurd outcome. However, such exceptions are rare and require strong justifications.

While “In Rigore Juris” emphasizes strict adherence to the law, “In Equitate” refers to the principle of fairness and equity. “In Equitate” allows the court to consider extenuating circumstances and apply the law in a more flexible manner.

Yes, “In Rigore Juris” can be invoked in civil cases to argue for a strict interpretation of contractual terms or legal obligations. However, the court may still consider equitable principles to ensure fairness.

The principle of “In Rigore Juris” is applicable in many legal systems, especially those based on common law traditions. However, the extent to which it is followed may vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.

In general, statutory law takes precedence over the principle of “In Rigore Juris.” If a statute explicitly provides for exceptions or deviations from strict interpretation, the court must follow the statutory provisions.

“In Rigore Juris” can influence the interpretation and application of legal precedent. If a previous court decision strictly adhered to the letter of the law, subsequent courts may be inclined to follow the same approach.

While it is difficult to challenge the principle of “In Rigore Juris” itself, specific applications of the principle can be challenged through appeals. If a party believes that the strict interpretation of the law led to an unjust outcome, they can seek a review by a higher court.