The inherency doctrine in patents states that if a missing element in a prior-art reference is either inherently present in or a natural result of the product or process, it can still be considered anticipated. This means that if a person with average knowledge in the field would know that the missing element is there, it cannot be patented as a new invention. However, if a substance, such as a chemical compound, was accidentally created but not acknowledged or valued at the time, it can still be patented at a later date. Inherency differs from obviousness because it must be based on factual evidence, rather than just a possibility or likelihood.
The inherency doctrine in patent law allows for the anticipation of an invention even if a prior-art reference lacks a specific element, as long as that element is necessarily present or a natural result of the product or process. This means that if a person skilled in the field would recognize the presence or outcome of the missing element, the invention is not considered novel and cannot be patented. For instance, if a company develops a new adhesive that is exceptionally strong and durable, but a prior-art reference exists for a similar adhesive without disclosing its chemical composition, the inherency doctrine would permit anticipation of the new adhesive if the missing chemical composition is inherently present or naturally results from the adhesive, and a person skilled in the field would know this. Consequently, if the chemical composition is indeed inherently present or a natural result of the adhesive, the new adhesive would not be deemed novel and would be ineligible for patent protection. Another example of the inherency doctrine is the accidental creation of a chemical compound that was not recognized or appreciated at the time of its creation. If the compound is later discovered and found to be useful, it may be eligible for a patent even though it was not intentionally created. Overall, the inherency doctrine plays a crucial role in patent law by ensuring that only genuinely novel inventions are granted patents.
The Inherency Doctrine is a legal principle that states that if a property or characteristic is inherent in a product or process, it cannot be patented.
The purpose of the Inherency Doctrine is to prevent the patenting of natural phenomena or products that are already known or obvious.
The Inherency Doctrine applies to inventions that involve natural phenomena, laws of nature, or products that are already known or obvious.
The Inherency Doctrine can prevent an invention from being patented if it involves a property or characteristic that is inherent in a product or process.
An invention that involves the use of gravity to power a machine would likely be affected by the Inherency Doctrine, as gravity is a natural phenomenon.
No, an invention cannot be patented if it involves a property or characteristic that is inherent in a product or process.
The Inherency Doctrine is concerned with properties or characteristics that are inherent in a product or process, while obviousness is concerned with whether an invention would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
The USPTO may use the Inherency Doctrine to reject patent applications that involve properties or characteristics that are inherent in a product or process.
Yes, the Inherency Doctrine can be used to challenge an existing patent if it can be shown that the invention involves a property or characteristic that is inherent in a product or process.
An inventor can avoid running afoul of the Inherency Doctrine by focusing on novel and non-obvious aspects of their invention, rather than relying on properties or characteristics that are inherent in a product or process.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherency-doctrine/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Inherency Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherency-doctrine/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Inherency Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherency-doctrine/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Inherency Doctrine. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherency-doctrine/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts