Inherent anticipation occurs when an invention is deemed unoriginal or lacking novelty due to the existence of similar products or processes with identical characteristics. Unlike obviousness, inherent anticipation is based on factual evidence rather than mere possibilities. The inherency doctrine enables anticipation to be inferred even if a prior-art reference lacks an essential element that is inherently present or naturally produced by the product or process. This rule prevents the patenting of existing inventions solely by claiming an inherent element, while also permitting the later patentability of substances that were unintentionally created but not previously acknowledged or valued.
The term “inherent anticipation” is used in patents to refer to the lack of novelty in an invention caused by the existence of prior-art products or processes that possess the same characteristics. This lack of novelty arises when the missing element in a prior-art reference is either necessarily present in or a natural result of the product or process, and a person with ordinary skill in the field would know it. Inherency is different from obviousness because a lack of novelty must be based on factual evidence, rather than mere possibility or probability. For instance, if a company invents a rechargeable battery with a longer lifespan than any other battery on the market, but a prior-art reference already exists for a rechargeable battery with a similar lifespan, then the company’s invention lacks novelty and cannot be patented due to inherent anticipation. Another example is a chemical compound that was accidentally created but not recognized or appreciated. Even though the compound was not intentionally created, it can still be patented if it meets the requirements for patentability. These examples demonstrate how inherent anticipation can impact the patentability of an invention. It is crucial for inventors to conduct thorough research to ensure that their invention is novel and not already covered by prior-art references.
Inherent anticipation refers to a situation where the prior art, or existing knowledge, inherently discloses all the elements of an invention, even if it is not explicitly mentioned or described.
If an invention is inherently anticipated, it means that it lacks novelty and is not eligible for patent protection. Inherent anticipation is a ground for rejecting a patent application.
Yes, an invention can be inherently anticipated even if it is not explicitly disclosed in the prior art. If the prior art inherently discloses all the elements of the invention, it can still be considered as inherently anticipated.
In determining inherent anticipation, factors such as the knowledge and understanding of a person skilled in the relevant field, the nature of the invention, and the explicit or implicit disclosure in the prior art are considered.
No, inherent anticipation cannot be overcome. If an invention is inherently anticipated, it lacks novelty, and novelty is a fundamental requirement for patentability.
No, inherent anticipation and obviousness are different concepts. Inherent anticipation relates to the disclosure of all the elements of an invention in the prior art, while obviousness relates to whether the invention would have been obvious to a person skilled in the relevant field.
Yes, inherent anticipation can be used as a defence in a patent infringement lawsuit. If the accused product or process is inherently anticipated by the prior art, it means that the patent is invalid and cannot be infringed upon.
Determining inherent anticipation requires a thorough analysis of the prior art and the elements of the invention. It often involves consulting experts in the relevant field and conducting a detailed comparison between the prior art and the invention.
Yes, inherent anticipation can be established based on common general knowledge. If a person skilled in the relevant field would inherently know or understand the elements of the invention, it can be considered as inherently anticipated.
There are no specific exceptions to inherent anticipation. If an invention is inherently anticipated, it lacks novelty and is not eligible for patent protection. However, each case is unique, and it is essential to consult with a qualified attorney to fully understand the specific circumstances and potential arguments.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherent-anticipation/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Inherent Anticipation. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherent-anticipation/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Inherent Anticipation. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherent-anticipation/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Inherent Anticipation. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/inherent-anticipation/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts