An intervening act occurs between the beginning and end of an event, altering the outcome. If the intervening act is significant enough, it can absolve someone of responsibility for the outcome. Intervening acts can be categorized as dependent or independent. A dependent act does not involve an action and cannot relieve someone of responsibility, while an independent act is based on a condition caused by an earlier event but not directly resulting from it.
An intervening act refers to an event that occurs between the initial event and the final outcome, causing a deviation from the natural progression of events that could have linked a wrongful act to an injury. While it can contribute to the outcome, it is not the primary cause. For instance, if a person drives recklessly and collides with another car, resulting in injuries, but then a third car crashes into the second car, causing more severe injuries, the third car is considered an intervening act. It disrupts the natural sequence of events that could have connected the reckless driving to the injuries. If the intervening act is significant enough to absolve the wrongdoer of any responsibility, it becomes a superseding cause. An independent intervening cause is one that affects a condition caused by a preceding cause but is not a result of that cause. In summary, an intervening act is an event that occurs between the initial event and the final outcome, altering the natural progression of events that could have linked a wrongful act to an injury.
An intervening act refers to an action or event that occurs between the defendant’s initial wrongful act and the resulting harm or injury. It is an event that breaks the chain of causation and may affect the defendant’s liability.
An intervening act can potentially relieve the defendant of liability if it is considered a superseding cause, meaning it was unforeseeable and independent of the defendant’s actions. However, if the intervening act was reasonably foreseeable or connected to the defendant’s initial act, it may not absolve the defendant of liability.
Yes, an intervening act can be used as a defence in a personal injury case if it is deemed a superseding cause. The defendant must prove that the intervening act was unforeseeable and broke the chain of causation, relieving them of liability.
Courts consider various factors, such as the foreseeability of the intervening act, the degree of control the defendant had over the situation, the nature of the defendant’s initial act, and the relationship between the initial act and the harm caused.
Yes, an intervening act can be used as a defence in a criminal case if it breaks the chain of causation and establishes that the defendant’s actions were not the direct cause of the harm or crime committed.
In contract disputes, an intervening act may be relevant if it renders the performance of the contract impossible or significantly changes the circumstances. It can potentially excuse a party from fulfilling their contractual obligations.
Yes, an intervening act can be used as a defence in a negligence claim if it is determined to be a superseding cause. It must be shown that the intervening act was unforeseeable and broke the chain of causation, relieving the defendant of liability.
An intervening act can be used as a defence in a product liability case if it can be proven that the harm or injury was caused by an unforeseeable and independent event, rather than a defect in the product itself.
In medical malpractice cases, an intervening act may be relevant if it can be shown that the harm or injury was caused by a subsequent medical intervention or the patient’s own actions, rather than the initial negligence of the healthcare provider.
In some cases, an intervening act can completely absolve a defendant of liability if it is considered a superseding cause. However, each case is unique, and the court will consider various factors to determine the extent to which the defendant should be held liable.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/intervening-act/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Intervening Act. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/intervening-act/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Intervening Act. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/intervening-act/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Intervening Act. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/intervening-act/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts