A police officer can briefly detain and question a person if they have a suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime. The officer may also search the person for a hidden weapon. This can be done without a warrant or probable cause, but only if the officer has reasonable suspicion. The Supreme Court has determined that this type of stop is constitutional, as long as it adheres to specific guidelines. It is also referred to as a Terry stop, field stop, or investigatory defence.
An investigatory stop, also referred to as a Terry stop or stop and frisk, occurs when a police officer briefly detains and questions an individual based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. During this stop, the officer may also search for a concealed weapon. It is important to note that this type of stop does not require a warrant or probable cause, but it must be supported by specific and articulable facts that indicate criminal behaviour. The Supreme Court confirmed the constitutionality of the stop and frisk in the landmark case of Terry v. Ohio in 1968. For instance, if a police officer observes a person acting suspiciously near a recently robbed store, they may conduct an investigatory stop to inquire and search for any potential weapons used in the robbery. Similarly, if an officer spots an individual walking in a high-crime area late at night, matching the description of a suspect involved in a series of burglaries, they may perform an investigatory stop to question the person and search for stolen property or weapons. These examples demonstrate how police officers can utilise investigatory stops to prevent and solve crimes, while still respecting the rights of individuals and adhering to reasonable suspicion.
An investigatory stop, also known as a Terry stop, is a brief detention by law enforcement officers based on reasonable suspicion that a person may be involved in criminal activity. It allows officers to temporarily detain and question individuals to gather information and determine if further action is necessary.
An investigatory stop is a temporary detention for questioning, while an arrest involves taking a person into custody based on probable cause that they have committed a crime. During an investigatory stop, officers may only detain individuals briefly and conduct a limited search for weapons, whereas an arrest allows for a more thorough search and the person’s freedom is significantly restricted.
Reasonable suspicion is a lower standard than probable cause and requires specific, articulable facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed. It is based on the totality of the circumstances and must be more than a mere hunch or intuition.
No, an officer must have reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop. Without reasonable suspicion, the stop would be considered a violation of your Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
You have the right to remain silent during an investigatory stop. However, it is generally advisable to provide basic identifying information, such as your name and address, as refusing to do so may escalate the situation or lead to additional legal consequences.
During an investigatory stop, officers may conduct a limited pat-down search for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous. However, they cannot conduct a full search of your person or belongings without your consent or probable cause.
An investigatory stop should be brief and limited in duration. The exact length of the stop will depend on the circumstances and the purpose of the stop. If the officer’s suspicions are dispelled or they obtain enough evidence to make an arrest, the stop should end promptly.
If an officer develops probable cause to believe that you have committed a crime during an investigatory stop, they may proceed to arrest you. However, an investigatory stop should not automatically lead to an arrest unless the officer has sufficient evidence to establish probable cause.
Yes, if you believe that an investigatory stop was unjustified or violated your rights, you can file a complaint with the law enforcement agency involved. It is advisable to consult with an attorney who specializes in civil rights or police misconduct to guide you through the process.
If an investigatory stop is found to be unjustified or in violation of your rights, any evidence obtained as a result of that stop may be deemed inadmissible in court. The exclusionary rule prohibits the use of evidence obtained through unconstitutional means. However, the specific circumstances and legal arguments may vary, so it is crucial to consult with an attorney to assess the admissibility of evidence in your case.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/investigatory-stop/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Investigatory Stop. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/investigatory-stop/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Investigatory Stop. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/investigatory-stop/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Investigatory Stop. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/investigatory-stop/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts