The concept of judgemental immunity states that professionals cannot be held accountable for providing advice or opinions that were given in good faith and with the belief that it was in the client’s best interest, even if it later turns out to be incorrect due to a mistake in judgement or analyzing an unsettled aspect of their profession. For instance, a lawyer who makes an error in trial tactics related to an unclear area of law cannot be held liable for malpractice. This principle is also known as the error-of-judgement rule.
Judgmental immunity, also referred to as the error-of-judgement rule, is a legal principle that shields professionals from being held responsible for advice or opinions provided in good faith and with a sincere belief that it was in the client’s best interests, even if it was based on a mistake in judgement or in analyzing an unresolved aspect of their profession. For instance, if an attorney makes an error in trial tactics related to an unresolved area of the law, they may, under specific circumstances, avoid a malpractice claim arising from that tactical error. In simpler terms, this means that if the attorney made an honest mistake in judgement or analysis of the law, they cannot be held accountable for malpractice. However, it is crucial that the error was made in good faith and with the belief that it was in the client’s best interest. This principle safeguards professionals from being sued for every mistake they make, as long as they acted in good faith. Another example is when a doctor prescribes a medication that has a rare side effect that was not known at the time. If the doctor made the decision to prescribe the medication in good faith and with the belief that it was the best treatment for the patient, they may not be held liable for malpractice. This example demonstrates how the error-of-judgement rule can be applicable to medical professionals. As long as the doctor acted in good faith and with the belief that it was the best course of treatment for the patient, they cannot be held responsible for malpractice if they made an honest mistake in judgement or analysis of the medication’s potential side effects.
Judgmental immunity is a legal doctrine that protects government officials from personal liability for discretionary actions taken within the scope of their official duties.
Law enforcement officers are often protected by judgmental immunity when carrying out their duties, as long as their actions are within the scope of their official responsibilities and not in violation of clearly established law.
In some cases, judgmental immunity can be waived if a government official’s actions are found to be outside the scope of their official duties or in violation of clearly established law.
Judgmental immunity and qualified immunity are similar in that they both protect government officials from personal liability, but qualified immunity specifically applies to law enforcement officers and requires that their actions not violate clearly established law.
Yes, judgmental immunity can be used as a defence in a lawsuit to protect government officials from personal liability for their discretionary actions.
Judgmental immunity does have limitations, such as when a government official’s actions are found to be outside the scope of their official duties or in violation of clearly established law.
Yes, judgmental immunity can be challenged in court if it is believed that a government official’s actions do not qualify for protection under the doctrine.
Judgmental immunity can impact civil rights cases by providing protection to government officials from personal liability for their discretionary actions, which can make it more difficult for plaintiffs to hold them accountable.
Judgmental immunity is based on the principle that government officials should be able to carry out their duties without fear of personal liability for their discretionary actions.
No, judgmental immunity specifically applies to government officials and does not extend to non-governmental entities.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/judgemental-immunity/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Judgmental Immunity. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 20 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/judgemental-immunity/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Judgmental Immunity. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/judgemental-immunity/ (accessed: May 20 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Judgmental Immunity. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 20 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/judgemental-immunity/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts