A jury challenge occurs when there is a question about the eligibility of a juror to serve on the jury. There are various reasons for challenges, such as bias or lack of qualification. In some cases, a challenge can be made without explanation, but if it is believed to be based on race or gender, a reason must be provided. Military courts also have challenges, but they are limited to specific reasons.
The input describes a formal objection made by a party in a legal case to disqualify a potential juror or an entire jury panel. It provides examples of different types of challenges that can be made, including a Batson challenge, a challenge for cause, and a peremptory challenge. These examples demonstrate how a jury challenge can be based on various reasons, such as discrimination or bias, and can be either for cause or peremptory.
Yes, a juror can be challenged for bias if there is evidence that they may not be able to remain impartial in the case.
A peremptory challenge is a challenge to a potential juror without the need to provide a reason. Each side in a case is typically allowed a limited number of peremptory challenges.
In some cases, a juror can be challenged based on their occupation or background if it is believed that it may affect their ability to be impartial.
A challenge for cause is a challenge to a potential juror based on specific reasons, such as a personal connection to the case or a bias that may affect their ability to be impartial.
No, a juror cannot be challenged based on their race or gender as it is considered discriminatory.
The number of peremptory challenges allowed varies by jurisdiction and the type of case, but it is typically a limited number for each side.
In some cases, a juror can be challenged based on their religious beliefs if it is believed that it may affect their ability to be impartial.
In some cases, a juror can be challenged based on their prior criminal history if it is believed that it may affect their ability to be impartial.
In some cases, a juror can be challenged based on their social media activity if it is believed that it may affect their ability to be impartial or if they have made prejudicial statements about the case.
Yes, a juror can be challenged based on their personal relationships with the parties involved in the case if it is believed that it may affect their ability to be impartial.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/jury-challenge/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Jury Challenge. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/jury-challenge/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Jury Challenge. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/jury-challenge/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Jury Challenge. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/jury-challenge/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts