When judges interpret a document or law, they should adhere to the literal canon, which means they should only consider the exact words written and not speculate on the writer’s intentions. This approach is also known as strict constructionism or textualism, and it is particularly crucial when dealing with laws that involve punishments. A strict constructionist judge will strictly adhere to the literal words of the law, without taking into account other sources to comprehend its meaning.
Literal canon, also known as strict constructionism, is a legal term that describes the doctrine of interpreting a document or statute solely based on its literal terms. This means that judges following this doctrine do not consider other sources to determine the meaning of the document or statute. For example, if a statute states that stealing a car results in imprisonment for “not less than three years,” a strict constructionist judge would interpret this to mean that the minimum sentence is exactly three years, without any reduction. Similarly, if a contract specifies that a payment must be made “on or before the 15th day of the month,” a strict constructionist judge would interpret this to mean that the payment must be made on or before the 15th day, with no allowance for any delay. The literal canon doctrine emphasizes the importance of adhering strictly to the words used in the document or statute, rather than considering the intent of the lawmakers or the context in which it was written.
Literal Canon refers to the principle of interpreting legal texts, such as statutes or contracts, based on their plain and ordinary meaning. It emphasizes the literal interpretation of the words used in the text without considering external factors or intentions of the drafters.
Literal Canon stands in contrast to other methods of interpretation, such as purposive or contextual interpretation, which consider the purpose, context, and legislative intent behind the legal text. Literal Canon focuses solely on the literal meaning of the words used.
Literal Canon is typically applied when the language of the legal text is clear and unambiguous. If the words used in the text have a plain and ordinary meaning, courts and legal practitioners may rely on Literal Canon to interpret the text.
Yes, there are exceptions to Literal Canon. Courts may deviate from a strict literal interpretation if it leads to absurd or unreasonable results. In such cases, courts may resort to other methods of interpretation to ensure a more just and equitable outcome.
Literal Canon can be used in various legal contexts, including statutory interpretation, contract interpretation, and constitutional interpretation. However, its application may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific legal issue at hand.
The advantages of using Literal Canon include predictability, as it relies on the plain meaning of the words, and respect for the separation of powers, as it limits judicial discretion in interpreting legal texts.
One limitation of Literal Canon is that it may not always capture the true intent or purpose behind a legal text. It can lead to rigid interpretations that fail to consider the broader context or societal changes. Additionally, some legal texts may contain ambiguous or unclear language, making a strict literal interpretation challenging.
Courts typically rely on dictionaries, legal precedents, and common usage to determine the plain and ordinary meaning of words. They may also consider the legislative history or drafting notes if available.
In some cases, legislative intent may override Literal Canon. If there is clear evidence of the legislative intent that goes against the plain meaning of the words, courts may deviate from Literal Canon and interpret the text accordingly.
No, Literal Canon is just one of several methods of interpretation used in legal practice. Courts and legal practitioners often employ a combination of methods, including purposive, contextual, and historical interpretation, to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the legal text.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-canon/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Literal Canon. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-canon/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Literal Canon. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-canon/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Literal Canon. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-canon/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts