Melioribus damnis, which translates to “of the better damages” in Law Latin, is employed in cases where a jury erroneously assigns individual damages to multiple defendants for a shared wrongdoing. In such instances, the plaintiff has the option to pursue judgement against the defendant who has been assigned the highest damages and dismiss the case against the remaining defendants.
Melioribus damnis is a legal term that pertains to a plaintiff’s decision on which defendant to pursue judgement against when the jury has erroneously granted separate damages against multiple defendants for a shared wrongdoing. The plaintiff has the option to seek judgement against the defendant who has been assigned the highest amount of damages and subsequently dismiss the case against the remaining defendants. For instance, in a scenario where two drivers were involved in a car accident and the jury awarded separate damages against both drivers, the plaintiff can opt to pursue judgement against the driver responsible for causing the most significant harm and then withdraw the case against the other driver. This legal term is utilised in situations where multiple defendants are implicated in a joint tort, and the jury mistakenly awards separate damages against each defendant. By allowing the plaintiff to pursue judgement against the defendant who caused the most harm and dismiss the case against the other defendants, this ensures that the plaintiff receives equitable compensation for their damages.
“Melioribus Damnis” is a Latin phrase that translates to “with better damages” in English. It refers to a legal principle that allows a plaintiff to recover damages that are greater than the actual loss suffered, in order to deter the defendant from engaging in similar wrongful conduct in the future.
In personal injury cases, “Melioribus Damnis” allows the injured party to seek compensation not only for their actual medical expenses and lost wages but also for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and other intangible losses resulting from the injury.
No, “Melioribus Damnis” is generally not applicable in contract disputes. It is primarily used in tort cases where there is a wrongful act or negligence involved.
Yes, there are limitations to the application of “Melioribus Damnis.” Courts will consider factors such as the severity of the harm, the defendant’s conduct, and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence, if any, in determining the appropriate amount of damages.
While “Melioribus Damnis” allows for the recovery of damages beyond the actual loss suffered, its primary purpose is to deter future wrongful conduct rather than to punish the defendant. Punitive damages, on the other hand, are specifically awarded to punish the defendant for their egregious behavior.
The recognition and application of “Melioribus Damnis” may vary across jurisdictions. Some jurisdictions may have specific statutes or case law that govern the availability and calculation of damages, while others may not recognize the concept at all.
No, “Melioribus Damnis” is not applicable in criminal cases. It is a civil law principle that deals with compensatory damages in civil lawsuits.
To prove the need for “Melioribus Damnis,” you will typically need to provide evidence of the defendant’s wrongful conduct, the extent of your injuries or losses, and any other relevant factors that justify the award of damages beyond the actual loss suffered.
Yes, defendants can raise various legal defences against a claim seeking “Melioribus Damnis.” These defences may include arguing that the plaintiff’s injuries or losses were not caused by the defendant’s actions, that the plaintiff contributed to their own injuries, or that the requested damages are excessive or unreasonable.
Yes, parties involved in a legal dispute can agree to waive the application of “Melioribus Damnis” in a settlement agreement. This means that the plaintiff agrees to accept a specific amount of damages, typically in exchange for the defendant’s agreement to resolve the matter without further litigation.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/melioribus-damnis/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Melioribus Damnis. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/melioribus-damnis/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Melioribus Damnis. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/melioribus-damnis/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Melioribus Damnis. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/melioribus-damnis/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts