The missing-evidence rule is a legal principle that allows the jury to infer that the evidence not presented by someone would have been unfavorable to their case if they fail to provide it.
The missing-evidence rule is a legal principle that allows the jury to infer that if a party fails to present evidence at trial that they had control over and that would have been relevant to the case, the evidence would have been unfavorable to that party. For instance, if a plaintiff in a personal injury case neglects to provide medical records that were accessible to them, the jury may assume that the records would have indicated that the plaintiff’s injuries were not as severe as claimed. Similarly, if a defendant in a criminal case chooses not to present an alibi witness that they had the ability to call, the jury may assume that the witness would have testified against the defendant. The missing-evidence rule is based on the notion that parties are obligated to present all pertinent evidence to the court, and failure to do so can be interpreted as an admission that the evidence would not have supported their case.
The missing-evidence rule is a legal principle that states that if a party fails to produce evidence that is within their control and could reasonably be expected to support their case, the court may draw an inference that the evidence would be unfavorable to that party.
The purpose of the missing-evidence rule is to prevent parties from withholding or destroying evidence that could be crucial to the resolution of a legal dispute. It encourages parties to act in good faith and ensures that all relevant evidence is presented before the court.
The missing-evidence rule applies to any type of evidence that is within a party’s control and could reasonably be expected to support their case. This can include documents, photographs, videos, emails, or any other form of evidence that is relevant to the dispute.
If a party fails to produce evidence that is within their control and could reasonably be expected to support their case, the court may draw an inference that the evidence would be unfavorable to that party. This means that the court may assume that the missing evidence would have weakened the party’s position or strengthened the opposing party’s position.
Yes, the missing-evidence rule can be applied in both civil and criminal cases. It is a fundamental principle of fairness and applies to any legal dispute where the production of evidence is required.
The burden of proof for invoking the missing-evidence rule lies with the party seeking to draw an inference from the missing evidence. They must demonstrate that the evidence was within the control of the opposing party, that it could reasonably be expected to support their case, and that its absence is prejudicial to their position.
Yes, a valid explanation for the missing evidence can overcome the inference drawn under the missing-evidence rule. If a party can provide a reasonable explanation for the absence of the evidence, such as loss, destruction, or lack of knowledge, the court may not draw an adverse inference.
No, the missing-evidence rule generally applies only to parties to the litigation. Non-parties are not subject to the same obligations to produce evidence, although they may be required to provide evidence through other means, such as subpoenas.
Yes, there are certain exceptions to the missing-evidence rule. For example, if the missing evidence is equally available to both parties, the court may not draw an inference. Additionally, if the missing evidence is not relevant or material to the case, the rule may not apply.
Yes, the missing-evidence rule can be waived by agreement between the parties. If the parties agree to exclude or disregard certain evidence, the court may not apply the missing-evidence rule to that specific evidence. However, such agreements must be voluntary and made with full knowledge of the potential consequences.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/missing-evidence-rule/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Missing-Evidence Rule. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/missing-evidence-rule/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Missing-Evidence Rule. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/missing-evidence-rule/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Missing-Evidence Rule. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/missing-evidence-rule/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts